What general tips do you have for golfing in Python? I'm looking for ideas which can be applied to code-golf problems and which are also at least somewhat specific to Python (e.g. "remove comments" is not an answer).
Please post one tip per answer.
Usually you do it this way (6 bytes):
n%2==0
But you can reduce it to 5 bytes:
n%2<1
And even 4 bytes:
~n&1
Bonus tip: when you use if
you can ignore spacebetween if
and ~n&1
this way:
if~n&1:
Iterating over indices in a list
Sometimes, you need to iterate over the indices of a list l
in order to do something for each element that depends on its index. The obvious way is a clunky expression:
# 38 chars
for i in range(len(l)):DoStuff(i,l[i])
The Pythonic solution is to use enumerate
:
# 36 chars
for i,x in enumerate(l):DoStuff(i,x)
But that nine-letter method is just too long for golfing.
Instead, just manually track the index yourself while iterating over the list.
# 32 chars
i=0
for x in l:DoStuff(i,x);i+=1
Here's some alternatives that are longer but might be situationally better
# 36 chars
# Consumes list
i=0
while l:DoStuff(i,l.pop(0));i+=1
# 36 chars
i=0
while l[i:]:DoStuff(i,l[i]);i+=1
Combining with this tip, suppose you have a situation like
for _ in[0]*x:doSomething()
a="blah"
You can instead do:
for a in["blah"]*x:doSomething()
to skip out on a variable assignment. However, be aware that
exec"doSomething();"*x;a="blah"
in Python 2 is just shorter, so this only really saves in cases like assigning a char (via "c"*x
) or in Python 3.
However, where things get fun is with Python 2 list comprehensions, where this idea still works due to a quirk with list comprehension scope:
[doSomething()for a in["blah"]*x]
(Credits to @xnor for expanding the former, and @Lembik for teaching me about the latter)
Say you have two 2-element tuples which represent points in the Euclidean plane, e.g. x=(0, 0)
and y=(3, 4)
, and you want to find the distance between them. The naïve way to do this is
d=((x[0]-y[0])**2+(x[1]-y[1])**2)**.5
Using complex numbers, this becomes:
c=complex;d=abs(c(*x)-c(*y))
If you have access to each coordinate individually, say a=0, b=0, c=3, d=4
, then
abs(a-c+(b-d)*1j)
can be used instead.
d=abs(x[0]-y[0]+(x[1]-y[1])*1j)
. Can this be made shorter than what you have? I'm just wondering if 1j
could be useful in converting a tuple to a complex number.
\$\endgroup\$
*1j
is usually shorter.
\$\endgroup\$
x=(0,0);y=(3,4);c=complex;d=abs(c(*x)-c(*y))
, different assignments: a,b=0,0;c,d=3,4;d=((a-c)**2+(b-d)**2)**.5
. Yes, writing x=0,0;y=3,4
does indeed make the complex option shorter, but using different assignments makes it even shorter: x=0,0;y=3,4;c=complex;d=abs(c(*x)-c(*y)
. Finally, consider @mbomb007's approach with different assignments: a,b=0,0;x,y=3,4;d=abs(a-x+(b-y)*1j)
: with or without the assignment, it's shorter than all of the alternatives I've found.
\$\endgroup\$
1j
part, so I've added that in. The general point was basically that ((a-b)**2+(c-d)**2)**.5
is rarely ever needed.
\$\endgroup\$
Python 3.6 introduces a new string literal that is vastly more byte-efficient at variable interpolation than using %
or .format()
in non-trivial cases. For example, you can write:
l='Python';b=40;print(f'{l}, {b} bytes')
instead of
l='Python';b=43;print('%s, %d bytes'%(l,b))
' '+str(n)
(10 bytes) and f' {n}'
(7 bytes).
\$\endgroup\$
' %d'%n
I think, where this example doesn't save any bytes. You do need more args for this to help
\$\endgroup\$
==
short circuitingIf you have:
print
);Then you might be able to use ==
over or
to save a byte.
Here's printing all numbers n
under 100 that have f(n)
less than 2:
# Naive
for n in range(100):f(n)<2and print(n)
# Invert condition
for n in range(100):f(n)>1or print(n)
# Use ==
for n in range(100):f(n)<2==print(n)
use os.urandom()
as a random source instead of random.randint()
ord()
to get a number instead of character? len("ord(os.urandom(1))")
-> 18
and len("random.randint()")
-> 16
\$\endgroup\$
import random
vs import os
. randint() needs 3 parameters anyway. If you need a list of random numbers, you can use map(ord,os.urandom(N))
Also, sometimes, you actually need a random char instead of a number
\$\endgroup\$
id(id)
, substituting the inner id
with any 3-letter builtin if you need more than one. 'abc'[id(id)%3]
is 11 characters shorter than 'abc'[random.randrange(3)]
, not even counting the import statement.
\$\endgroup\$
Commented
Apr 20, 2013 at 2:04
id
can be applied on mostly everything, such as 1
or []
.
\$\endgroup\$
Commented
Jul 5, 2018 at 9:41
list.insert
Instead of list.insert
, appending to a slice is shorter:
L.insert(i,x)
L[:i]+=x,
For example:
>>> L = [1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> L[:-2]+=5,
>>> L
[1, 2, 5, 3, 4]
>>> L[:0]+=6,
>>> L
[6, 1, 2, 5, 3, 4]
In Python 3, a bytes object is written as a string literal preceded by a b
, like b"golf"
. It acts much like a tuple of the ord
values of its characters.
>>> l=b"golf"
>>> list(l)
[103, 111, 108, 102]
>>> l[2]
108
>>> 108 in l
True
>>> max(l)
111
>>> for x in l:print(x)
103
111
108
102
Python 2 also has bytes objects but they act as strings, so this only works in Python 3.
This gives a shorter way to express an explicit list of numbers between 0 to 255. Use this to hardcode data. It uses one byte per number, plus three bytes overhead for b""
. For example, the list of the first 9 primes [2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23]
compresses to 14 bytes rather than 24. (An extra byte is used for a workaround explained below for character 13.)
In many cases, your bytes object will contain non-printable characters such as b"\x01x02\x03"
for [1, 2, 3]
. These are written with hex escape characters, but you may use them a single characters in your code (unless the challenge says otherwise) even though SE will not display them. But, characters like the carriage return b"\x0D"
will break your code, so you need to use the two-char escape sequence "\r"
.
Use powers of the imaginary unit to calculate sines and cosines.
For example, given an angle d
in degrees, you can calculate the sine and cosine as follows:
p=1j**(d/90.)
s=p.real
c=p.imag
This can also be used for related functions such as the side length of a unit n
-gon:
l=abs(1-1j**(4./n))
0in
instead of not all
(or, under DeMorgan's Law, any(not ...)
)
not all(...)
~-all(...) # shorter than `not`, and with more forgiving precedence
0in(...)
not all map(f,a)
0in map(f,a) # the reduction is more significant here because you can omit the parentheses
This only works if the falsey values in the ...
sequence are actually False
(or 0
/0.0
/etc.) (not []
/""
/{}
etc.).
1in
instead of any
This one isn't shorter with a comprehension:
any(f(x)for x in a)
1in(f(x)for x in a)
But it sometimes saves bytes with other kinds of expression by letting you omit the parentheses:
any(map(f,a))
1in map(f,a)
This has a similar truthiness-related caveat to the above, though.
These might sometimes have less favourable precedence, because they use the in
operator. However, if you're combining this with a comparison you may be able to make additional use of this tip about comparison condition chaining.
You can also use these if you want the entire for
-comprehension in any
/all
to always be fully evaluated:
any([... for x in a])
1in[... for x in a]
This one's rare, but if you need to evaluate and discard an extra expression for every item in a comprehension, you could use a dictionary here at no extra cost:
1in[(condition,side_effect)[0]for x in a]
1in{condition:side_effect for x in a}
because dict
's in
checks only the keys.
Check whether a positive integer n
is a perfect power of 2, that is one of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ...
, with any of these expressions:
n&~-n<1
n&-n==n
n^n-1>=n
2**n%n<1
The third expression also works for n==0
giving False
. The last is easy to modify to checking for, say, powers of 3.
-n^n<-n
is also an option, even better if you're detecting a negative power of 2
\$\endgroup\$
-n&n^n
gives 0 for powers of 2, including zero.
\$\endgroup\$
Abuse the fact that in case of an expression yielding True
boolean operators return the first value that decides about the outcome of the expression instead of a boolean:
>>> False or 5
5
is pretty straightforward. For a more complex example:
>>> i = i or j and "a" or ""
i's value remains unchanged if it already had a value set, becomes "a" if j has a value or in any other case becomes an empty string (which can usually be omitted, as i most likely already was an empty string).
i=i or j and"a"or""
\$\endgroup\$
If you are doing something small in a for loop whose only purpose is to invoke a side effect (pop
, print
in Python 3, append
), it might be possible to translate it to a list-comprehension. For example, from Keith Randall's answer here, in the middle of a function, hence the indent:
if d>list('XXXXXXXXX'):
for z in D:d.pop()
c=['X']
Can be converted to:
if d>list('XXXXXXXXX'):
[d.pop()for z in D]
c=['X']
Which then allows this golf:
if d>list('XXXXXXXXX'):[d.pop()for z in D];c=['X']
An if
within a for
works just as well:
for i in range(10):
if is_prime(i):d.pop()
can be written as
[d.pop()for i in range(10)if is_prime(i)]
[d.pop()for i in range(10)if is_prime(i)]
is shorter as for i in range(10):notprime(i)or d.pop()
, so it's shorter with a False condition instead of a True one if the condition can be squished into the or
. Obviously, if you need the popped values the comprehension is shorter, but this post is about side effects.
\$\endgroup\$
Commented
Jul 4, 2021 at 22:11
Usually you use map
to transform a collection
>> map(ord,"abc")
[97, 98, 99]
But you can also use it to repeatedly act on object by a built-in method that modifies it.
>> L=[1,2,3,4,5]
>> map(L.remove,[4,2])
[None, None]
>> L
[1, 3, 5]
Be aware that the calls are done in order, so earlier ones might mess up later ones.
>> L=[1,2,3,4,5]
>> map(L.pop,[0,1])
[1, 3]
>> L
[2, 4, 5]
Here, we intended to extract the first two elements of L
, but after extracting the first, the next second element is the original third one. We could sort the indices in descending order to avoid this.
An advantage of the evaluation-as-action is that it can be done inside of a lambda
. Be careful in Python 3 though, where map
objects are not evaluated immediately. You might need an expression like [*map(...)]
or *map(...),
to force evaluation.
A detailed guide
I had worked with short-circuiting and/or
's for a while without really grasping how they work, just using b and x or y
just as a template. I hope this detailed explanation will help you understand them and use them more flexibly.
Recursive named lambda
functions are often shorter than programs that loop. For evaluation to terminate, there must be control flow to prevent a recursive call for the base case. Python has a ternary condition operator that fits the bill.
f=lambda x:base_value if is_base_case else recursive_value
Note that list selection won't work because Python evaluates both options. Also, regular if _:
isn't an option because we're in a lambda
.
Python has another option to short-circuit, the logical operator keywords and
and or
. The idea is that
True or b == True
False and b == False
so Python can skip evaluate b
in these cases because the result is known. Think of the evaluation of a or b
as "Evaluate a
. If it's True, output a
. Otherwise, evaluate and output b
." So, it's equivalent to write
a or b
a if a else b
It's the same for a or b
except we stop if a
is False.
a and b
a if (not a) else b
You might wonder why we didn't just write False if (not a) else b
. The reason is that this works for non-Boolean a
. Such values are first converted to a Boolean. The number 0
, None
, and the empty list/tuple/set become False
, and are so called "Falsey". The rest are "Truthy".
So, a or b
and a and b
always manages to produce either a
or b
, while forming a correct Boolean equation.
(0 or 0) == 0
(0 or 3) == 3
(2 or 0) == 2
(2 or 3) == 2
(0 and 0) == 0
(0 and 3) == 0
(2 and 0) == 0
(2 and 3) == 3
('' or 3) == 3
([] and [1]) == []
([0] or [1]) == [0]
Now that we understand Boolean short-circuiting, let's use it in recursive functions.
f=lambda x:base_value if is_base_case else recursive_value
The simplest and most common situation is when the base is something like f("") = ""
, sending a Falsey value to itself. Here, it suffices to do x and
with the argument.
For example, this function doubles each character in a string, f("abc") == "aabbcc"
.
f=lambda s:s and s[0]*2+f(s[1:])
Or, this recursively sums the cubes of numbers 1 through n
, so f(3)==36
.
f=lambda n:n and n**3+f(n-1)
Another common situation is for your function to take non-negative numbers to lists, with a base case of 0
giving the empty list. We need to transform the number to a list while preserving Truthiness. One way is n*[5]
, where the list can be anything nonempty. This seems silly, but it works.
So, the following returns the list [1..n]
.
f=lambda n:n*[5]and f(n-1)+[n]
Note that negative n
will also give the empty list, which works here, but not always. For strings, it's similar with any non-empty string. If you've previously defined such a value, you can save chars by using it.
More generally, when your base value is an empty list, you can use the arithmetic values True == 1
and False == 0
to do:
[5]*(is_not_base_case)and ...
TODO: Truthy base value
TODO: and/or
and
and or
work might be: x or y=if x:return x;return y
x and y:if x:return y;return x
\$\endgroup\$
If you need to keep multiple conditions inside comprehension, you can replace and with if to save a byte each time.
Works in Python 2 and 3.
[a for a in 'abc'if cond1()and cond2()or cond3()and cond4()and cond5()]
[a for a in 'abc'if cond1()if cond2()or cond3()if cond4()if cond5()]
Lets play with some list tricks
a=[5,5,5,5,5,5,5]
can be written as:
a=[5]*7
It can be expanded in this way. Lets, say we need to do something like
for i in range(0,100,3):a[i]=5
Now using the slicing trick we can simply do:
a[0:100:3]=[5]*(1+99//3)
a[:100:3]=[5]*34
\$\endgroup\$
Cut out newlines wherever you can.
At the top-level, it doesn't matter.
a=1
b=9
Takes the same amount of characters as:
a=1;b=9
In the first case you have a newline instead of a ;
. But in function bodies, you save however deep the nesting level is:
def f():
a=1;b=9
Actually in this case, you can have them all on one line:
def f():a=1;b=9
If you have an if
or a for
, you can likewise have everything on one line:
if h:a=1;b=9
for g in(1,2):a=1;b=9
But if you have a nesting of control structures (e.g. if
in a for
, or if
in a def
), then you need the newline:
if h:for g in(1,2):a=1;b=9 #ERROR
if h:
for g in(1,2):a=1;b=9 # SAUL GOODMAN
a,b=1,9
does not save any bytes
\$\endgroup\$
Commented
Jul 12, 2017 at 14:40
Say you want to apply f
composed k
times to the number 1
, then print the result.
This can be done via an exec
loop,
n=1
exec("n=f(n);"*k)
print(n)
which runs code like n=1;n=f(n);n=f(n);n=f(n);n=f(n);n=f(n);print(n)
.
But, it's one character shorter to use eval
print(eval("f("*k+'1'+")"*k))
which evaluates code like f(f(f(f(f(1)))))
and prints the result.
This does not save chars in Python 2 though, where exec
doesn't need parens but eval
still does. It does still help though when f(n)
is an expression in which n
appears only once as the first or last character, letting you use only one string multiplication.
For a dictionary with string keys which also happen to be valid Python variable names, you can get a saving if there's at least three items by using dict
's keyword arguments:
{'a':1,'e':4,'i':9}
dict(a=1,e=4,i=9)
The more string keys you have, the more quote characters you'll save, so this is particularly beneficial for large dictionaries (e.g. for a kolmogorov challenge).
When squaring single letter variables, it is shorter to times it by itself
>>> x=30
>>> x*x
900
Is one byte shorter than
>>> x=30
>>> x**2
900
One trick I have encountered concerns returning or printing Yes/No answers:
print 'YNeos'[x::2]
x is the condition and can take value 0 or 1.
I found this rather brilliant.
A condition like
s = ''
if c:
s = 'a'
can be written as
s = c*'a'
and there is possibly a need for parenthesis for condition.
This can also be combined with other conditions as (multiple ifs)
s = c1*'a' + c2*'b'
or (multiple elifs)
s = c1*'a' or c2*'b'
For example FizzBuzz problem's solution will be
for i in range(n):
print((i%3<1)*"Fizz"+(i%5<1)*"Buzz" or i)
"Buzz"
.
\$\endgroup\$
Commented
Aug 23 at 4:05
*
) to pass a bunch of single character strings into a functionFor example:
a.replace("a","b")
a.replace(*"ab") -2 bytes
some_function("a","b","c")
some_function(*"abc") -5 bytes
In fact, if you have n
single-character strings, you will save 3(n - 1) - 1
or 3n - 4
bytes by doing this (because each time, you remove the ","
for each one and add a constant *
).
You can compute cos
and sin
without needing to import math
by using complex arithmetic. For an angle of d
degrees, its cosine is
(1j**(d/90)).real
and its sine is
(1j**(d/90)).imag
Here, 1j
is how Python writes the imaginary unit \$i\$. If your angle is r
radians, you'll need to use 1j**(r/(pi/2))
, using a decimal approximation of pi/2
if the challenge allows it.
If you're curious, this all works because of Euler's formula:
$$i^x = (e^{i \pi /2})^x = e^{i \pi /2 \cdot x} = \cos(\pi/2 \cdot x) + i \sin(\pi /2 \cdot x)$$
!=
can be replaced with -
here is a example
n=int(input())
if n!=69:
print("thanks for being mature")
instead of using !=
you can use -
after that it should look like this
n=int(input())
if n-69:
print("thanks for being mature")
To concatenate strings or characters, it can be shorter to repeatedly append to the empty string than to join
.
23 chars
s=""
for x in l:s+=f(x)
25 chars
s="".join(f(x)for x in l)
Assume here that f(x)
stands for some expression in x
, so you can't just map
.
But, the join
may be shorter if the result doesn't need saving to a variable or if the for
takes newlines or indentation.
When mapping a function on a list in Python 3, instead of doing [f(x)for x in l]
or list(map(f,l))
, do [*map(f,l)]
.
It works for all other functions returning generators too (like filter
).
The best solution is still switching to Python 2 though
It's common to want to iterate over adjacent pairs of items in a list or string, i.e.
"golf" -> [('g','o'), ('o','l'), ('l','f')]
There's a few methods, and which is shortest depends on specifics.
Shift and zip
## 47 bytes
l=input()
for x,y in zip(l,l[1:]):do_stuff(x,y)
Create a list of adjacent pairs, by removing the first element and zipping the original with the result. This is most useful in a list comprehension like
sum(abs(x-y)for x,y in zip(l,l[1:]))
You can also use map
with a two-input function, though note that the original list is no longer truncated.
## Python 2
map(cmp,l[:-1],l[1:])
Keep the previous
## 41 bytes, Python 3
x,*l=input()
for y in l:do_stuff(x,y);x=y
Iterate over the elements of the list, remembering the element from a previous loop. This works best with Python 3's ability to unpack to input into the initial and remaining elements.
If there's an initial value of x
that serves as a null operation in do_stuff(x,y)
, you can iterate over the whole list.
## 39 bytes
x=''
for y in input():do_stuff(x,y);x=y
Truncate from the front
## 46 bytes
l=input()
while l[1:]:do_stuff(*l[:2]);l=l[1:]
Keep shortening the list and act on the first two elements. This works best when your operation is better-expressed on a length-two list or string than on two values.
I've written these all as loops, but they also lend to a recursive functions. You can also adjust to get cyclic pairs by putting the first element at the end of the list, or as the initial previous-value.
The Python 3.8 "walrus" assignment expressions allow a short expression to give pairs, though with an extra initial element.
>>> p=''
>>> [(p,p:=c)for c in"golf"]
[('', 'g'), ('g', 'o'), ('o', 'l'), ('l', 'f')]
x
that serves as a null operation" at the end of your list as well so the final item is processed with it you can do x=''(\n)for y in*input(),x:do_stuff(x,y);x=y
\$\endgroup\$
Commented
Jul 4, 2021 at 22:30
itertools
stuff imported for some other reason with from itertools import*
, you can use pairwise
for this, replacing for x,y in zip(l,l[1:]):
with for x,y in pairwise(l):
to save a character. Also, on your "Truncate from the front" solution, you can shave a byte by using unpacking and a single indexing operation in place of two uses of slicing: while l[1:]:a,*l=l;do_stuff(a,l[0])
\$\endgroup\$
Commented
Feb 24, 2023 at 1:49
:=
operator in 3.8 \$\endgroup\$