Beta Decay's user avatar
Beta Decay's user avatar
Beta Decay's user avatar
Beta Decay
  • Member for 8 years, 1 month
  • Last seen more than a week ago
Stats
22,837
reputation
1.2m
reached
230
answers
100
questions
Loading…
About

I have a friend who's an artist and has sometimes taken a view which I don't agree with very well. He'll hold up a flower and say "look how beautiful it is," and I'll agree. Then he says "I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing," and I think that he's kind of nutty. First of all, the beauty that he sees is available to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as refined aesthetically as he is ... I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it's not just beauty at this dimension, at one centimeter; there's also beauty at smaller dimensions, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the colors in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it is interesting; it means that insects can see the color. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower forms? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the science knowledge only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don't understand how it subtracts.

~ Richard P. Feynman

7
gold badges
66
silver badges
162
bronze badges
578
Score
273
Posts
83
Posts %
226
Score
57
Posts
17
Posts %
215
Score
43
Posts
13
Posts %
43
Score
17
Posts
5
Posts %
42
Score
39
Posts
12
Posts %
28
Score
30
Posts
9
Posts %
Top posts
View all questions and answers
question
184
Sep 24, 2015
question
79
Jun 30, 2017
question
61
Aug 20, 2018
question
60
Aug 11, 2015
question
48
Jul 23, 2018
question
42
Aug 2, 2018
question
41
Aug 13, 2018
answer
41
Aug 28, 2015
question
37
Aug 25, 2015