Timeline for Output the Current Time
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
127 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4 at 14:19 | answer | added | bigyihsuan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 19, 2023 at 14:55 | answer | added | Kai Burghardt | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 21:23 | answer | added | EasyasPi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 19:35 | answer | added | EasyasPi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 0:15 | answer | added | chunes | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 3, 2022 at 22:16 | answer | added | Kai Burghardt | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 10, 2017 at 21:02 | answer | added | Taylor Raine | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 10, 2017 at 19:47 | answer | added | The Fifth Marshal | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 7, 2017 at 17:26 | answer | added | steenbergh | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 23:22 | answer | added | Carcigenicate | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 19:16 | history | edited | Addison Crump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 23 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 19:12 | comment | added | Jasen | the time of the first incorrect output is random therefore, program only has to output once! ??? | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 19:07 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @Jasen No, but the meaning of "that is fine" implies that the wait option is still valid, regardless of the eventual time loss. I have clarified this for you. | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 19:06 | history | edited | Addison Crump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 70 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 19:01 | comment | added | Jasen | rules six does not say "you may ignore the description and rule five and do this instead" it only says must... | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 14:28 | answer | added | sergiol | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 12:22 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @Jasen Please read the sixth rule, which provides an exception to that. | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 11:28 | comment | added | Jasen | @YetiCGN in single threaded solutions sleep needs to be tuned to compensate for the time elapsed looping and printing, else one of the printout valies will be skipped sooner or later. therefor breaking "must be one second apart" a "solution" that outpute 1000001 microseconds apart is not compliant so far as I can tell. | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 10:56 | answer | added | Erik the Outgolfer | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 10:18 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @EriktheOutgolfer I don't see a reason to disallow it. | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 9:42 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | @VoteToClose Can I wait a second before the first output? | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 23:46 | answer | added | Flow | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 9:22 | answer | added | Beta Decay | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 23:01 | answer | added | acrolith | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 22:19 | answer | added | Scepheo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 22:11 | answer | added | YetiCGN | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 22:03 | comment | added | YetiCGN | F. Hauri: How so? Rule 6 says "If you wait a second between each output, that is fine as well." | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 21:49 | answer | added | Copper | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 31, 2016 at 17:23 | answer | added | Chromozorz | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 31, 2016 at 12:33 | answer | added | Katenkyo | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 31, 2016 at 10:04 | answer | added | O S | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 31, 2016 at 1:01 | answer | added | DavidC | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 31, 2016 at 0:39 | answer | added | Drew Christensen | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 19, 2016 at 14:02 | answer | added | draegtun | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 18, 2016 at 19:56 | answer | added | weatherman115 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 18, 2016 at 11:39 | answer | added | m654 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 18, 2016 at 11:21 | answer | added | m654 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 17, 2016 at 23:03 | comment | added | F. Hauri - Give Up GitHub |
Warning: All sleep 1 based answer break rule 5: you must guarantee one, and only one, output of time per second. !!
|
|
| May 17, 2016 at 19:54 | answer | added | F. Hauri - Give Up GitHub | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 16:13 | answer | added | user47018 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 14:41 | answer | added | cat | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 5:06 | history | edited | Dennis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
unbreak HTTPS
|
| Mar 30, 2016 at 4:56 | history | edited | Dennis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed width leaderboard caused overlap
|
| Mar 30, 2016 at 4:46 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 2, 2016 at 21:41 | answer | added | Roujo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 21:13 | answer | added | cat | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 4:54 | answer | added | Luis Mendo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 5, 2016 at 22:45 | answer | added | MemoryPenguin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 5, 2016 at 22:36 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @NBZ Yes, that's fine. | |
| Jan 5, 2016 at 21:34 | comment | added | Adám |
May there be spaces between the parts and the colons? 12 : 23 : 34
|
|
| Dec 22, 2015 at 20:02 | answer | added | cat | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 16, 2015 at 14:20 | answer | added | Fels | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 16, 2015 at 13:49 | answer | added | ormaaj | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 16, 2015 at 2:41 | comment | added | Arcturus | Looking at your watch: 0 bytes ಠ_ಠ | |
| Dec 13, 2015 at 23:33 | answer | added | Lord Yuuma | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2015 at 1:31 | answer | added | Adám | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 10, 2015 at 1:19 | answer | added | TheInitializer | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2015 at 0:48 | answer | added | cat | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2015 at 18:05 | answer | added | steenbergh | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2015 at 13:58 | answer | added | Addison Crump | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2015 at 13:23 | answer | added | Addison Crump | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:22 | answer | added | JimmyJazzx | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 13:48 | answer | added | Emigna | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 1, 2015 at 10:12 | answer | added | Fozzedout | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 19:44 | answer | added | jfs | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 19:00 | answer | added | jfs | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 18:26 | answer | added | Ashwin Gupta | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 15:41 | answer | added | insertusernamehere | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 15:27 | answer | added | user19214 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 15:17 | answer | added | Jacob Misirian | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 9:40 | answer | added | gamesmad | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 18:54 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @ev3commander If it's only one visible output per second, then that should be fine. | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 15:56 | answer | added | lynn | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 14:03 | comment | added | user46167 | From my Snap! answer, do I have to keep the wait 1 sec block? It's going to be still like 9:21:8...9:21:9... because unlike most other languages it doesn't keep whatever it said before. | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 13:48 | answer | added | marinus | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 0:45 | answer | added | Mama Fun Roll | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 23:50 | answer | added | GiantTree | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 21:36 | answer | added | 6infinity8 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 21:20 | answer | added | Craig Roy | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 20:53 | answer | added | jqkul | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 19:38 | answer | added | Paŭlo Ebermann | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 18:11 | answer | added | user19214 | timeline score: 16 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 16:03 | answer | added | ETHproductions | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 14:47 | answer | added | cat | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 14:44 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 14:31 | answer | added | Gamerdog | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 14:26 | answer | added | user46167 | timeline score: 16 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 13:11 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 11:12 | history | edited | Addison Crump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 327 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2015 at 11:09 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @ThomasKwa I don't really see a problem with it, as it is human-readable as a time. | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 6:40 | answer | added | errorseven | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 6:35 | answer | added | Sven Hohenstein | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 6:30 | answer | added | lirtosiast | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 6:28 | comment | added | lirtosiast |
Are we allowed to display something like 01:47:2 for 01:47:02?
|
|
| Nov 28, 2015 at 6:21 | comment | added | user45941 | @Vi. meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/6961/… | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 6:02 | comment | added | Vi. | Shall there be a tag catalog for "Since this is a catalog, languages created after this challenge are allowed to compete."? | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 5:27 | answer | added | cat | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 4:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/670466634734288896 | ||
| Nov 28, 2015 at 4:53 | answer | added | Brad Gilbert b2gills | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 4:43 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 3:49 | comment | added | Dennis | Also, if it is in fact allowed to print more than just the current time, you should explicitly say so in the question. | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 3:37 | answer | added | Conor O'Brien | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 3:24 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 2:39 | answer | added | a spaghetto | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 2:32 | answer | added | a spaghetto | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 2:25 | answer | added | Liam | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 1:31 | answer | added | Liam | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 0:45 | answer | added | intrepidcoder | timeline score: 19 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 0:22 | answer | added | Danko Durbić | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 28, 2015 at 0:13 | answer | added | user45941 | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:34 | answer | added | The Fifth Marshal | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:24 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @SuperJedi224 Absolutely correct. | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:21 | comment | added | SuperJedi224 |
@VoteToClose Does that mean my answer doesn't actually need the substring call?
|
|
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:18 | answer | added | user81655 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:16 | answer | added | steve | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:12 | answer | added | nicael | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:11 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @LegionMammal978 Absolutely fine. Extra output doesn't really matter, as long as the program at some point continuously outputs time. | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:10 | answer | added | Addison Crump | timeline score: 55 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:09 | answer | added | SuperJedi224 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:07 | comment | added | LegionMammal978 | Is it okay if your language's kernel automatically intercepts interrupts to show a debug menu? | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:07 | answer | added | flawr | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:05 | answer | added | LegionMammal978 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:01 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @user81655 Yes, it can be any form of interrupt - don't worry about coding that bit. | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:01 | answer | added | Addison Crump | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 23:00 | comment | added | user81655 | Does "until cancelled by an interrupt" include closing the program or does it need a mechanism to stop the cycle coded into it? | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 22:57 | answer | added | Maltysen | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 22:55 | history | asked | Addison Crump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |