Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with c++
Search options not deleted
user 123731
This challenge is related to the C++ language. Note that challenges that require the answers to be in a specific language are generally discouraged.
2
votes
0
answers
251
views
Shortest way to cause a seg fault at 0x9c?
In honour of CrowdStrike's exception at 0x9c, what's the shortest way (character-wise) to cause a segfault by dereferencing address 0x9c?
The best I can come up with is:
int main(){*(int*)156=0;}
Rule …
- 49