Timeline for Simple integer operation calculator
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
66 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2021 at 2:46 | answer | added | Razetime | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 17, 2021 at 1:30 | answer | added | NoLongerBreathedIn | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 13, 2017 at 19:29 | answer | added | FedeWar | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 7, 2017 at 6:11 | history | edited | anna328p | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 56 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:02 | history | edited | anna328p | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Sep 28, 2016 at 15:03 | answer | added | rnso | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 13:54 | answer | added | t-clausen.dk | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 5, 2016 at 9:36 | answer | added | BlackCap | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 3, 2016 at 21:51 | history | edited | anna328p | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
cleanified implementation
|
| Sep 3, 2016 at 21:44 | comment | added | anna328p | @Adám no, they must be exactly as specified. Sorry. | |
| Sep 3, 2016 at 21:44 | comment | added | anna328p | @MartinEnder xnor did that for me | |
| Sep 3, 2016 at 21:43 | comment | added | anna328p | @TonHospel It outputs 0 because the accumulator starts at 0 and changes only with operations. | |
| Sep 1, 2016 at 13:46 | answer | added | Shaun Wild | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 1, 2016 at 2:39 | answer | added | Ian Chew | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 21:09 | answer | added | primodemus | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 10:50 | answer | added | Ismael Miguel | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 | comment | added | seshoumara |
@TobySpeight you can divide this way in dc to have the desired rounding: [1-]S@d0>@2/, because the default output precision is 0 (see my answer)
|
|
| Aug 30, 2016 at 7:39 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 6:54 | comment | added | Adám |
May we substitute the symbols with +-×÷ or 'PMTD'?
|
|
| Aug 30, 2016 at 2:41 | answer | added | xsot | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 19:54 | answer | added | Jörg Hülsermann | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 15:06 | answer | added | Vlo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 15:05 | answer | added | KoreanwGlasses | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 14:58 | answer | added | user56344 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 14:27 | answer | added | TheBikingViking | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 14:22 | answer | added | Scepheo | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 13:39 | answer | added | Paul Schmitz | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 13:27 | answer | added | YetiCGN | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 13:23 | comment | added | Toby Speight |
Curse that nasty round-down requirement! I had a nice 41-byte GNU sed + dc answer: s/[+-]/1&/g;s/[*/]/2&/g;s/.*/dc -e 0d&p/e, but it rounds towards zero when you divide a negative :-(
|
|
| Aug 29, 2016 at 13:21 | answer | added | Florin Chis | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 11:03 | answer | added | Arnauld | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 10:52 | answer | added | seshoumara | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 10:30 | answer | added | Stefano Sanfilippo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 10:23 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 10:13 | answer | added | Blue | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 10:11 | history | edited | xnor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1180 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2016 at 10:01 | answer | added | xnor | timeline score: 28 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 9:54 | answer | added | edc65 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 9:25 | answer | added | Winnie The Pooh | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 8:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/770178023475773440 | ||
| Aug 29, 2016 at 7:38 | comment | added | Martin Ender | Please add more test cases. | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 7:11 | comment | added | Ton Hospel | Does the program have to handle the empty input string ? | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 7:04 | answer | added | Leaky Nun | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 6:41 | comment | added | Yytsi |
My recursive solution returns an floating point number. Is this allowed? The results are correct, but they contain .0 at the end.
|
|
| Aug 29, 2016 at 6:40 | answer | added | Yytsi | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 4:13 | comment | added | anna328p | @Zwei That's exactly where I got this challenge. | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 3:23 | comment | added | Zwei | I can't help but notice that the snippet of code featured on the home page of rust-lang solves this challenge. | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 2:22 | answer | added | Jonathan Allan | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 1:55 | answer | added | betseg | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 1:34 | answer | added | Jordan | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 0:47 | answer | added | xsot | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 0:41 | history | edited | anna328p | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 39 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2016 at 0:33 | answer | added | LegionMammal978 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 0:08 | answer | added | Destructible Lemon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 0:07 | comment | added | Dennis | @LegionMammal978 Yet the reference implementation returns -1. | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 23:58 | comment | added | LegionMammal978 |
@Dennis Well, C truncation says it should round to 0, so that should be 0...
|
|
| Aug 28, 2016 at 23:32 | comment | added | Dennis |
What should -/ return?
|
|
| Aug 28, 2016 at 23:28 | answer | added | Conor O'Brien | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 23:26 | answer | added | Brad Gilbert b2gills | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 23:23 | answer | added | nimi | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 23:12 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 23:07 | answer | added | Adnan | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 22:56 | history | edited | anna328p | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Aug 28, 2016 at 22:55 | comment | added | Conor O'Brien | Then you should specify this explicitly. | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 22:52 | comment | added | Conor O'Brien |
So... it's not strictly integer, since / can yield non-integers.
|
|
| Aug 28, 2016 at 22:51 | history | asked | anna328p | CC BY-SA 3.0 |