Fortran, 68 51 bytes

Skimmed off 17 bytes, because who needs indents and spaces?

As a tribute to senior and the fact there was no Fortran answer yet. Well, now I know why: this is a pretty hard language to golf! Just one or two indents already take up more bytes than the shortest answer here :)).

program T
do i=1,10
print*,('*',j=1,10)
end do
end

Try it! (ideone)

I tried golfing it down by introducing a nested 'implied' do loop, but the newline character wasn't available until Fortran 2003. Also, it's insanely verbose...

Fortran, 68 51 49 bytes

Skimmed off 17 bytes, because who needs indents and spaces?

-2 bytes thanks to @Joffan

As a tribute to senior and the fact there was no Fortran answer yet. Well, now I know why: this is a pretty hard language to golf! Just one or two indents already take up more bytes than the shortest answer here :)).

program T
do i=0,9
print*,('*',j=0,9)
end do
end

Try it! (ideone)

I tried golfing it down by introducing a nested 'implied' do loop, but the newline character wasn't available until Fortran 2003. Also, it's insanely verbose...

Fortran, 68 bytes

As a tribute to senior and the fact there was no Fortran answer yet. Well, now I know why: this is a pretty hard language to golf! Just one or two indents already take up more bytes than the shortest answer here :))

program T
    do i=1,10
        print*, ('*', j=1,10)
    end do
end

Try it! (ideone)

I tried golfing it down by introducing a nested 'implied' do loop, but the newline character wasn't available until Fortran 2003. Also, it's insanely verbose...

Fortran, 68 51 bytes

Skimmed off 17 bytes, because who needs indents and spaces?

As a tribute to senior and the fact there was no Fortran answer yet. Well, now I know why: this is a pretty hard language to golf! Just one or two indents already take up more bytes than the shortest answer here :)).

program T
do i=1,10
print*,('*',j=1,10)
end do
end

Try it! (ideone)

I tried golfing it down by introducing a nested 'implied' do loop, but the newline character wasn't available until Fortran 2003. Also, it's insanely verbose...