Timeline for Calculate pi to 5 decimals [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
52 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 20, 2023 at 23:47 | history | notice added | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | Historical significance | |
| S Jul 20, 2023 at 23:47 | history | locked | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | ||
| Jul 20, 2023 at 23:43 | history | closed |
ATaco lyxal The Thonnu rydwolf caird coinheringaahin g♦ |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jul 20, 2023 at 4:11 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 20, 2023 at 23:43 | |||||
| Jul 20, 2023 at 3:51 | comment | added | ATaco | I’m voting to close this question because use of a specific algorithm is impossible to objectively validate | |
| Jul 18, 2023 at 11:36 | history | edited | The Thonnu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
MathJax
|
| Jul 18, 2023 at 11:11 | answer | added | manatwork | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 10:09 | answer | added | JosiahRyanW | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 2:12 | answer | added | Ethan Chapman | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 20, 2020 at 21:43 | answer | added | Dominic van Essen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 14, 2020 at 16:18 | answer | added | 2014MELO03 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 14, 2020 at 3:20 | answer | added | Ben | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 5, 2017 at 16:13 | answer | added | James Holderness | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 18, 2017 at 23:52 | answer | added | phroureo | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 18, 2017 at 18:36 | answer | added | Simply Beautiful Art | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 24, 2015 at 15:14 | comment | added | MCMastery | "It can be answered in about 10 lines with c#" someone please beat that | |
| Apr 30, 2014 at 1:21 | answer | added | Milktrader | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 21:18 | answer | added | aditsu quit because SE is EVIL | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 11:01 | answer | added | MT0 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 21:29 | comment | added | msh210 | Later near-duplicate: codegolf.stackexchange.com/q/22009 | |
| Dec 12, 2012 at 0:42 | answer | added | arshajii | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 20:10 | history | edited | primo |
added pi tag
|
|
| Sep 13, 2012 at 22:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 28, 2012 at 15:39 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2012 at 0:37 | answer | added | flodel | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 6, 2012 at 16:28 | answer | added | marinus | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 6, 2012 at 16:08 | answer | added | memowe | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 5, 2012 at 19:37 | answer | added | skeevey | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 1, 2012 at 21:42 | comment | added | J B | Dupe, but it's so old it's not here: stackoverflow.com/q/407518/12274 | |
| Sep 1, 2012 at 18:43 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 1, 2012 at 0:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/241687165480861696 | ||
| Aug 31, 2012 at 21:09 | answer | added | chucksmash | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 31, 2012 at 20:42 | answer | added | ceased to turn counterclockwis | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 31, 2012 at 14:34 | answer | added | TwoScoopsofPig | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 31, 2012 at 12:24 | answer | added | Perello | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 31, 2012 at 9:56 | answer | added | Averroes | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 31, 2012 at 0:21 | answer | added | arrdem | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 19:02 | answer | added | Peter Taylor | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 18:39 | answer | added | fftw | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 16:59 | comment | added | acolyte | huh, a friend of mine posted something about this problem on facebook last night. he didn't golf it though. | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 14:28 | answer | added | FireFly | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 12:48 | answer | added | ugoren | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 11:14 | comment | added | DavidC | @PeterTaylor "Slowly converging" is an understatement. It took roughly one million places to attain the desired precision! | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 7:03 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | @DavidCarraher, although that's mathematically inevitable using this series, from a numerical analytical point of view it's highly dubious. A slowly converging alternating series is a poster child for loss of significance. | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 22:59 | comment | added | DavidC | I think you should require that the algorithm be one of successive approximation: the longer you compute, the closer you get to pi. | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 22:15 | answer | added | ardnew | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 19:06 | history | edited | nos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 70 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 17:43 | answer | added | Peter Taylor | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 17:35 | answer | added | DavidC | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 17:30 | comment | added | PleaseStand | Have you seen codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/506/… , which is very similar? At the very least, trig functions should be banned for this problem because they allow for trivial solutions such as this QBASIC program: ?INT(4E5*ATN(1))/1E5 | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 15:46 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 30, 2012 at 4:01 | |||||
| Aug 29, 2012 at 15:44 | comment | added | Matt |
You should probably add some more rules, otherwise you will get answers like (python) p=lambda:3.14159
|
|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 15:39 | history | asked | nos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |