Timeline for Create a programming language that only appears to be unusable
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 10, 2017 at 9:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://latex.codecogs.com/ with https://latex.codecogs.com/
|
|
| Oct 29, 2015 at 16:28 | comment | added | Martin Ender |
Well, as I said in the answer, I noticed that you could use f and b together to rotate the entire cube, so you can just rotate the affected side towards the left, undo the rotation there with l, and then rotate the cube back into its original orientation.
|
|
| S Oct 29, 2015 at 16:08 | history | suggested | Pokechu22 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
(Minor): Indent example code in the list so that it is nested within the list, instead of splitting the list and causing some (minor) confusion
|
| Oct 29, 2015 at 15:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 29, 2015 at 16:08 | |||||
| Oct 28, 2015 at 20:44 | comment | added | Liam | Hah no it was not. I probably could have been more clever to shorten them up. How did you figure out the inverses? | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 20:18 | comment | added | Martin Ender | Heh, looks like GAP was not being particularly clever about reversing the three input permutations. ;) | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 19:58 | history | edited | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added solution
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 11:16 | comment | added | Martin Ender | They were definitely a clue, but I think it wouldn't have taken that much longer if they had had different names. | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 11:13 | comment | added | Liam | I'm curious, would it have been decently harder if I had changed the names of the permutations to something less obviously about Rubik's cubes? | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 11:07 | history | edited | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
cracked
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 11:05 | comment | added | Liam | Wow that was faster than I expected. Thanks, I'm glad it was as fun to figure out as it was to write. | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 | comment | added | Martin Ender | Cracked. :) I'm really impressed by the language! | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 10:47 | history | edited | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed print-d command
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 6:27 | history | edited | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 103 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 5:39 | history | edited | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed error
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 4:28 | history | edited | Conor O'Brien | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 594 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 3:30 | history | edited | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 432 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 3:23 | history | edited | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 432 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 3:15 | history | answered | Liam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |