Timeline for Outputting ordinal numbers (1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 28, 2016 at 13:32 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | Welcome to PPCG! Please include your byte count on the header. (too late?) | |
| S Feb 14, 2014 at 7:11 | history | suggested | Sergey Telshevsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
language to h1
|
| Feb 14, 2014 at 7:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 14, 2014 at 7:11 | |||||
| May 11, 2012 at 13:32 | comment | added | Joseph Elcid | No its not necessary, I could have chosen w or x. Just wanted something meaningful. But you're right, it would have made the code a little shorter. | |
| Apr 29, 2012 at 3:49 | comment | added | Gaffi |
Wouldn't your first if check be shorter as if v>10 && v<14? I'm not familiar with ocaml, but is it necessary to have the string_v variable be so long?
|
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 16:29 | comment | added | Gareth | I've just tidied up the formatting on your code. Each line needs to be preceded by four spaces in order to be recognized as a code block. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 16:28 | history | edited | Gareth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed code formatting
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 15:49 | history | edited | Joseph Elcid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Certain values did not produce the correct output. Thanks
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 15:42 | comment | added | Joseph Elcid | yeah, you're right.. I've made the correction. Thanks | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 2:04 | comment | added | user3614 | input: 11 would yield output: 11st | |
| Jan 21, 2012 at 11:53 | history | edited | Joseph Elcid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Made a little mistake. replace the condition
|
| Jan 21, 2012 at 9:46 | history | answered | Joseph Elcid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |