Timeline for Print rotation-safe numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jan 11, 2015 at 0:47 | vote | accept | Wrzlprmft | ||
Dec 30, 2014 at 20:19 | history | edited | FryAmTheEggman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 30, 2014 at 20:14 | comment | added | FryAmTheEggman | @isaacg Thanks, fixed | |
Dec 30, 2014 at 20:14 | history | edited | FryAmTheEggman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 30, 2014 at 19:25 | comment | added | isaacg |
In the explanation, you appear to have an extra _ , before the `96 .
|
|
Dec 30, 2014 at 15:02 | comment | added | FryAmTheEggman |
@isaacg Thanks for the tip! I think for some reason I forgot that making a string of numbers was really short in pyth by using `. Anyway, you can write a code block with backticks by escaping them with \. For example: hell`o wo`rld
|
|
Dec 30, 2014 at 15:00 | history | edited | FryAmTheEggman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 24 characters in body
|
Dec 30, 2014 at 10:56 | comment | added | isaacg |
I don't think you need to use lists of integers for K and J - just use strings instead. Switching K to <backtick>69 and J to <backtick>N saves a few characters, as does inlining K in the resulting program. Shortest I could get under that technique was VhQJ``N+J*\.&nJX_J``69``96&eN!-J"0689 , 34 characters. (Two backticks are really one.)
|
|
Dec 29, 2014 at 17:39 | history | answered | FryAmTheEggman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |