Timeline for Translate ASCII text to braille
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
33 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 22, 2020 at 11:23 | answer | added | Razetime | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 22, 2016 at 16:11 | answer | added | Marcus Dirr | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 22, 2016 at 11:29 | answer | added | Adam | timeline score: 0 | |
Apr 18, 2016 at 2:22 | history | edited | cat |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 15, 2016 at 14:08 | answer | added | Fox | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 9, 2014 at 19:32 | vote | accept | Greg Hewgill | ||
Jul 6, 2014 at 7:47 | answer | added | aditsu quit because SE is EVIL | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 6, 2014 at 6:38 | comment | added | aditsu quit because SE is EVIL | @GregHewgill from what I've seen around here (to my dismay), that would likely get a bunch of downvotes and be closed as a duplicate | |
Jul 5, 2014 at 22:15 | comment | added | Greg Hewgill | @aditsu: I'm probably going to make the Grade-2 challenge a separate problem, and specify the requirements carefully. | |
Jul 5, 2014 at 22:14 | history | edited | Greg Hewgill | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 93 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2014 at 15:54 | comment | added | aditsu quit because SE is EVIL | Which English grade-2 Braille? American, British or Unified? | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 23:53 | answer | added | Level River St | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 20:37 | comment | added | Almo | Man... the penalty for unicode chars isn't big enough to make this interesting. I wanted to see how people were going to encode the braille set. | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 18:13 | comment | added | xem | can the output be vertical? | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 17:19 | comment | added | user344 | You could count bytes instead of characters and remove the penalty, the cost is about the same (@DigitalTrauma's first solution is 85 bytes). Edit: I just realized that would penalize languages like APL. It's up to you. | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 16:16 | answer | added | Digital Trauma | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 8:34 | comment | added | Greg Hewgill | @qwr: I'm not going to change the bonus at this point. Note that capitals aren't separate letter codes, but a prefix code that means "the next letter is capital". | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 8:17 | answer | added | Greg Hewgill | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 8:11 | answer | added | grc | timeline score: 6 | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 5:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/484928988884647936 | ||
Jul 4, 2014 at 4:48 | comment | added | qwr | @GregHewgill Can you make the bonus for including capitals, numbers, and punctuation larger? Currently that's 26+10+12 = 48 extra characters, not much of a bonus (unless you compress the braille data) | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 4:45 | comment | added | Greg Hewgill | @qwr the basic punctuation listed in the braille Wikipedia article. | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 4:42 | comment | added | qwr | What punctuation do we need to support? Some symbols don't have a standard braille equivalent. | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 4:36 | answer | added | qwr | timeline score: 6 | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 4:02 | answer | added | Snack | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 3:19 | answer | added | Matt | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 2:53 | comment | added | Greg Hewgill | @JanDvorak: Fair point, I've removed the "valiant attempt" weasel words. There is considerable variation in real world use of these contractions, and fully spelling out contractable words using only letters is valid but considered clumsy by braille readers. | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 2:50 | history | edited | Greg Hewgill | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tightened up -200 bonus criterion.
|
Jul 4, 2014 at 2:30 | comment | added | John Dvorak | I'm sorry, but a single example doesn't cut it in a code golf specification. Please give us the objective minimal requirements to qualify for the bonus. | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 2:23 | comment | added | Greg Hewgill | @JanDvorak: Thanks, updated question. | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 2:23 | history | edited | Greg Hewgill | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 123 characters in body
|
Jul 4, 2014 at 2:20 | comment | added | John Dvorak | define "valiant attempt". Also, is line-wrapping required? | |
Jul 4, 2014 at 2:00 | history | asked | Greg Hewgill | CC BY-SA 3.0 |