Timeline for The Love Letter Mystery [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 23, 2023 at 9:06 | history | undeleted |
Okx Timtech The Thonnu |
||
Jun 20, 2014 at 19:58 | history | deleted |
ProgramFOX Kyle Kanos Justin |
via Vote | |
Jun 16, 2014 at 13:32 | history | closed |
Howard Peter Taylor r3mainer Timtech nneonneo |
Not suitable for this site | |
Jun 16, 2014 at 10:38 | comment | added | r3mainer | HackerRank has its own discussion pages for each problem. Here's the discussion page for the problem you mentioned. | |
Jun 16, 2014 at 8:13 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 16, 2014 at 6:18 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 16, 2014 at 14:39 | |||||
Jun 16, 2014 at 5:23 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 16, 2014 at 5:33 | |||||
Jun 16, 2014 at 5:20 | history | reopened |
Martin Ender kernigh Jwosty Digital Trauma johnchen902 |
||
Jun 14, 2014 at 17:42 | comment | added | kernigh | My best guess is no, you can't ask this question at Stack Exchange. You can't ask it here (because it is closed), and I don't know any other Stack Exchange site about programming puzzles. | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 17:26 | comment | added | Dennis | @m.buettner: I think those questions would make a nice addition to our site and I did not downvote this one, but I'll always vote to close according to the rules laid out in the help center. | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 17:01 | comment | added | Martin Ender | @dornad I maintain it's on topic here, but until 4 other people decide to vote to reopen this question that's not of much help to you. In any case, as for your actual question, I suspect that there is a typo in their answer, and that A' and B' refer to the character values at the current pair of indices. What does their code do? | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:56 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Jun 14, 2014 at 20:03 | |||||
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:55 | history | edited | dornad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 226 characters in body
|
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:55 | comment | added | dornad | Hey guys, thanks for your input. I thought that this stackexchange site would had been more appropiate than stackoverflow. Is there any stackexchange site where this question is more appropiate? | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:45 | comment | added | ProgramFOX | @m.buettner I agree that we should welcome non-challenge questions, but this question is more related to algorithms than to programming and code. | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:38 | comment | added | Martin Ender | @Dennis this is currently being discussed in a lot of detail in chat and on meta, and there are a fairly large number of people who would welcome more non-challenge posts on the site, as it is still a site about Programming Puzzles & Code Golf (in addition to being a site for Programming Puzzles & Code Golf). As long as no consensus on this has been reached, I'd say closing or downvoting such questions is up to everyone's own opinion, but my opinion is we should welcome these questions, because they seem very much on topic to me and could well increase our traffic. | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:31 | history | closed |
ProgramFOX Claudiu Dennis Justin user16402 |
Not suitable for this site | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:26 | comment | added | Dennis | @m.buettner: The help center says that all questions on this site should have an objective primary winning criterion, and that "tips for golfing in some language" is the only exception to this rule. | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:25 | comment | added | ProgramFOX | @m.buettner It's a question about a specific approach to solve a programming puzzle, but it has nothing to do with code. | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:23 | comment | added | Martin Ender | @ProgramFOX It's a question about a programming puzzle, though, isn't it? | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:21 | history | edited | Claudiu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:21 | comment | added | ProgramFOX | This question appears to be off-topic because it is not a programming contest or a question about code golfing. | |
Jun 14, 2014 at 16:17 | history | asked | dornad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |