Timeline for Logarithmic Incrementation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
41 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2023 at 21:34 | answer | added | mrGoldenApple | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 15, 2023 at 8:56 | answer | added | The Empty String Photographer | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 15, 2023 at 8:13 | history | edited | The Empty String Photographer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2023 at 13:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| May 31, 2023 at 13:01 | |||||
| May 31, 2023 at 10:40 | answer | added | Kjetil S | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 31, 2023 at 10:13 | comment | added | The Empty String Photographer | @Shaggy see above comment ^ | |
| May 31, 2023 at 10:13 | comment | added | The Empty String Photographer | @Arnauld Or to chat maybe? | |
| May 31, 2023 at 9:44 | comment | added | Arnauld | @Shaggy Abusing mathematical notation for tasks that can be simply described in plain English is probably a bad idea. But this one is a purely mathematical function which -- I believe -- can only be clearly defined with mathematical notation. At any rate, this debate cannot be settled here in the comments. So maybe it should be brought to meta? | |
| May 31, 2023 at 9:11 | comment | added | The Empty String Photographer | @Shaggy By the way, the plain english explanation will be much harder to understand. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 9:10 | comment | added | Shaggy | @xigoi, the problem is the assumption is that everybody can read & interpret mathematical notation. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 8:28 | comment | added | xigoi | @Shaggy The mathematical notation used here is clear and inambiguous, so what's the problem? | |
| May 31, 2023 at 8:13 | answer | added | G B | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 31, 2023 at 1:40 | answer | added | 138 Aspen | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 20:02 | comment | added | Shaggy | Everyone that has answered clearly does, yes, but that in no way means that everyone does. What harm, exactly, do you see in adding a proper description so that more people can participate? | |
| May 30, 2023 at 20:00 | comment | added | The Empty String Photographer | @Shaggy Take a look at the answers. Everyone clearly understands the challenge. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 19:58 | comment | added | Shaggy | No, it's not. I have no clue what is being asked of us and don't understand your refusal to rectify that by simpy adding a proper description of that task and some worked examples. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 19:31 | comment | added | The Empty String Photographer | @Shaggy That won't have any effect. This is a well-written challenge. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 19:04 | answer | added | bigyihsuan | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 18:54 | comment | added | Shaggy | I've downvoted this for a lack of both a proper description of the task and a worked example. This will be my policy going forward for all challenges that only include MathJax or mathematical notation. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 13:55 | answer | added | CursorCoercer | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 7:18 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 1:41 | answer | added | alephalpha | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 1:36 | answer | added | Albert.Lang | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 0:12 | comment | added | Leo |
I believe the interesting property is more general than that: f({n,n,...,n})=n+1 no matter how long the list is
|
|
| May 29, 2023 at 23:21 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 29, 2023 at 20:02 | answer | added | loopy walt | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 19:01 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 18:32 | answer | added | pajonk | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 18:23 | answer | added | Jos Woolley | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 18:01 | history | edited | The Empty String Photographer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2023 at 17:00 | answer | added | Roman Czyborra | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 16:12 | answer | added | AnttiP | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 15:58 | answer | added | Arnauld | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 15:55 | history | edited | The Empty String Photographer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| May 29, 2023 at 15:51 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 29, 2023 at 17:28 | |||||
| May 29, 2023 at 15:45 | comment | added | RubenVerg | if |x| = 1 then f(x) = x_1 + 1, right? I think you mistyped the case | |
| May 29, 2023 at 15:41 | answer | added | Dadsdy | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 15:35 | comment | added | Shaggy | Please add a plain English description of the task along with a worked example or 2. | |
| May 29, 2023 at 15:23 | history | edited | The Empty String Photographer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| May 29, 2023 at 15:21 | answer | added | Adám | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 29, 2023 at 15:21 | history | asked | The Empty String Photographer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |