Timeline for Produce the number 2014 without any numbers in your source code
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2014 at 13:04 | comment | added | gmatht | Thanks. For the record, when I commented above this answer had been voted down to -2, so the context was more "would someone like to comment on why they are voting it down?" rather than "why isn't it upvoted?". It also wasn't intended as a criticism of Joe Z's question specification. | |
| Apr 17, 2014 at 0:46 | comment | added | Joe Z. | For that matter, I've edited the question again to make my intentions for the problem even clearer. Is "independently of any external variables" good enough? Even then, this answer isn't the shortest in either category, so I still won't accept it. | |
| Apr 17, 2014 at 0:45 | comment | added | Joe Z. | It follows the letter of the rules in a way that's almost universally considered boring and unoriginal. Additionally, it was posted almost three months after the original problem, meaning that it's way back on the 4th page where barely anybody will see it, let alone vote it up. | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 9:45 | history | edited | gmatht | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More edits to make my answer more clear.
|
| Apr 8, 2014 at 0:59 | comment | added | gmatht | Normally entries that explore edge cases are popular. This is the only answer they obeys the letter of the rules that is down voted (all other down voted answers rely on year=2014). Anyone care to comment on what rubs them wrong about this answer? | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 0:49 | history | edited | gmatht | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Shorten my answer as it isn't popular enough to justify full explanation.
|
| S Apr 6, 2014 at 12:14 | history | answered | gmatht | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Apr 6, 2014 at 12:14 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by gmatht |