Timeline for Sample from the discrete triangular distribution
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 15, 2023 at 22:02 | vote | accept | user1502040 | ||
| S Feb 10, 2023 at 8:57 | history | bounty ended | emanresu A | ||
| S Feb 10, 2023 at 8:57 | history | notice removed | emanresu A | ||
| Feb 6, 2023 at 20:16 | answer | added | Sean | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Feb 4, 2023 at 4:04 | history | bounty started | emanresu A | ||
| S Feb 4, 2023 at 4:04 | history | notice added | emanresu A | Reward existing answer | |
| Jan 28, 2023 at 1:47 | answer | added | Kip the Malamute | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 28, 2023 at 1:35 | answer | added | 97.100.97.109 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 19, 2022 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/1594027726947729411 | ||
| Oct 17, 2022 at 2:51 | vote | accept | user1502040 | ||
| S Feb 15, 2023 at 22:02 | |||||
| Oct 8, 2022 at 13:05 | history | reopened |
rydwolf loopy walt pxeger Seggan lyxal |
||
| Oct 8, 2022 at 6:51 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 8, 2022 at 13:11 | |||||
| Oct 6, 2022 at 3:28 | history | left closed in review |
caird coinheringaahin g♦ Wheat Wizard♦ |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| S Oct 6, 2022 at 0:07 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 6, 2022 at 3:28 | |||||
| S Oct 6, 2022 at 0:07 | history | edited | user1502040 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
elaborate and add test case
Added to review
|
| Oct 4, 2022 at 13:39 | history | closed |
Giuseppe Ginger Shaggy caird coinheringaahin g♦ lyxal |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 13:30 | comment | added | Dominic van Essen |
Perhaps you should also explain what you intend by "your code should take constant expected time". Currently, answers seem to make different assumptions about whether a PRNG can be expected to run in constant time for all values of n in random_function(n), or whether this matters.
|
|
| Oct 4, 2022 at 13:16 | answer | added | loopy walt | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 13:07 | answer | added | jdt | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 12:39 | history | edited | user1502040 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 20 characters in body
|
| Oct 4, 2022 at 12:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 4, 2022 at 13:39 | |||||
| Oct 4, 2022 at 12:22 | comment | added | Luis Mendo | I suggest you remove the "reasonable quality" requirement for the PRNG. We usually assume that PRNG's are good enough; see for example here | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 12:00 | answer | added | mousetail 'he-him' | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 11:54 | answer | added | Arnauld | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 11:46 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 11:42 | comment | added | Noodle9 | An explanation of the discrete triangular distribution with some test cases would be a lot clearer. Also reasonable quality isn't an objective criteria. | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 11:32 | answer | added | Dominic van Essen | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 4, 2022 at 11:10 | history | asked | user1502040 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |