Timeline for Finding Local Extremes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:04 | comment | added | undergroundmonorail |
@wrz I can't figure out how to edit a comment that's already been edited (the pencil icon seems to replace the edit button. is this by design?). I just wanted to add that, if I was smart, I'd have realized that my one-line function didn't need the \n in the declaration at all! That would have saved two characters, but the inclusion of return still makes it not worth it.
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:00 | history | edited | undergroundmonorail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Implemented suggestions from commenters
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 13:53 | comment | added | undergroundmonorail |
@v-x Oh, I like that a lot. Thank you :) edit: Actually you can save more than that! Since (l[i]-l[i-1])*(l[i]-l[i+1]) is 1 if l[i] is a local extreme and 0 otherwise, I don't need to use >0. I can just let python interpret it as a bool. :)
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 13:53 | comment | added | undergroundmonorail |
@wrz Ah, you're right. I was thrown off by the fact that def e(l):\n is the same number of characters as e=lambda l:, but I forgot that you don't need to use the return keyword. Thanks!
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 13:25 | comment | added | V-X |
if(l[i]-l[i-1])*(l[i]-l[i+1])>0 would reduce the code by 11 characters...
|
|
| Feb 26, 2014 at 23:15 | history | edited | Victor Stafusa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Syntax coloring
|
| Feb 26, 2014 at 22:10 | history | answered | undergroundmonorail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |