Timeline for Write an interpreter for "interpreter"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
46 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28 at 19:06 | answer | added | akamayu | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 28 at 19:05 | answer | added | ovs | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 28 at 18:00 | answer | added | Kai Burghardt | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 12, 2021 at 2:04 | answer | added | Razetime | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 12, 2021 at 0:23 | answer | added | Aaroneous Miller | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 1, 2021 at 22:18 | answer | added | Xcali | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 1, 2021 at 18:37 | answer | added | Caleb Fuller | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 1, 2021 at 18:20 | history | edited | user100690 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Mar 1, 2021 at 18:19 | comment | added | user100690 | @cairdcoinheringaahing yes | |
| Mar 1, 2021 at 17:20 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | Can we have a trailing newline? | |
| Feb 27, 2021 at 11:25 | comment | added | user100690 | @Razetime the point was to be like deadfish, but modified such that tricks using the length of a command (such as in Arnauld's answer) could be used | |
| Feb 27, 2021 at 10:05 | answer | added | AZTECCO | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 21:40 | comment | added | Alex bries | In case someone needs this language in a production environment, here is a compiler to c | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 17:17 | history | edited | user100690 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 17:04 | answer | added | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 17:00 | answer | added | Digital Trauma | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 16:36 | comment | added | user100690 | @Arnauld float division | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 16:20 | answer | added | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 16:00 | answer | added | Wasif | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 14:51 | answer | added | Unmitigated | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 13:27 | answer | added | Cray | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 13:26 | answer | added | Noodle9 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 12:58 | comment | added | user100690 |
As long as it is clear that the output is a number, that is fine. For example, outputting "1" instead of 1 is perfectly acceptable, however, outputting true instead of 1 is not
|
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 12:56 | comment | added | user100947 | Can we output characters instead of numbers? | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 12:00 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 11:23 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 10:29 | answer | added | user100947 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 10:20 | history | edited | user100690 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 10:07 | comment | added | Razetime | this looks like deadfish but with worse commands. | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:59 | answer | added | Kaddath | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:58 | answer | added | Arnauld | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:58 | answer | added | SevC_10 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:45 | answer | added | Danis | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:34 | history | edited | user100690 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:34 | comment | added | user100690 | @Arnauld Oops, sorry$ | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:32 | comment | added | user100690 | @OliverNi No, not necessarily | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:32 | history | edited | user100690 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 112 characters in body
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:32 | comment | added | Oliver Ni | Will there always be only one print? | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:32 | comment | added | user100690 | @Kaddath Yes... | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:32 | comment | added | user100690 |
@OliverNi Yes, there will always be one interpreter at the beginning.
|
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:30 | comment | added | Kaddath | Can we assume too that there will only be a single space between the instructions? | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:30 | comment | added | Oliver Ni |
You say that interpreter initializes the accumulator to 0. Will there always be one at the start of the program?
|
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:06 | history | edited | user100690 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:06 | comment | added | user100690 | You may assume that all code entered will be valid (editing that into rules) | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:06 | comment | added | Kaddath | Should we consider that no invalid code will be submitted to our program? (eg behaviour is not defined for invalid code?) | |
| Feb 26, 2021 at 9:00 | history | asked | user100690 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |