Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 3, 2014 at 2:23 comment added Tortoise @AlbertRenshaw Oh wow, that was a three-month-old post. I dug too deep.
Jun 2, 2014 at 22:09 comment added Albert Renshaw @Tortoise Did not exist at the time. But even if it did, as with most dialogues, 90% of people will click okay without reading it. For this very reason, dialogue consequences should never be permanent.
Jun 2, 2014 at 1:30 comment added Tortoise @AlbertRenshaw And you clicked OK to the JavaScript dialog that warns you that you will not be able to upvote it again?
Feb 25, 2014 at 17:39 comment added Cruncher @AlbertRenshaw Maybe you should write a Meta post about using #Meta to auto generate a Meta post. But, I guess you're too lazy until they implement this feature. At which time you requesting it would be moot
Feb 25, 2014 at 16:46 comment added Jason C @AlbertRenshaw I believe you can recast your upvote if somebody edits the answer.
Feb 24, 2014 at 9:11 comment added sehe I don't want to see your production code, if this is supposed to be the weirdest way to produce a stackoverflow
Feb 22, 2014 at 0:20 comment added OregonTrail I'm voting this up because I didn't know about the webbrowser module, it's awesome.
Feb 21, 2014 at 4:46 comment added Will @Mechanicalsnail produce: Show or provide (something) for consideration, inspection, or use. E.g., "he produced a sheet of paper from his pocket". Synonyms: present, offer, provide, furnish, advance, put forward, bring forward, come up with. Have I sufficiently swayed you to accept even the technical/pedantic correctness of this answer, or should I produce more evidence?
Feb 21, 2014 at 4:31 comment added Albert Renshaw @TimSeguine I up-votted your comment then accidentally clicked again and it undid my up vote and apparently if you undo an up vote it won't let you re-upvote after (even after waiting the 5 seconds)... I would go complain on META but I'm too lazy... you should be able to #Meta in comments and it auto-generates a post on META :D
Feb 20, 2014 at 20:33 review Suggested edits
Feb 20, 2014 at 20:52
Feb 20, 2014 at 18:14 comment added NobleUplift My face when I saw this answer. I was actually thinking the same thing when I clicked it from Hot Network Questions.
Feb 20, 2014 at 12:40 comment added Pierre Arlaud Not an answer as it's not in the error output.
Feb 20, 2014 at 4:15 comment added Sean Allred @TimSeguine Wow.
Feb 20, 2014 at 0:22 comment added Mechanical snail Well, this shows a Stack Overflow, but to produce one, this only works if it's Jeff Atwood or Joel Spolsky executing it.
Feb 19, 2014 at 4:08 comment added Justin @copy Recursion ain't needed. Ya just need ta make a stackoverflow.
Feb 19, 2014 at 2:16 comment added copy I don't see the recursion
Feb 19, 2014 at 0:01 review Suggested edits
Feb 19, 2014 at 0:04
Feb 18, 2014 at 20:58 comment added Tim Seguine Much literal. Very answer.
Feb 18, 2014 at 16:08 comment added James Webster Fantastic. Nice and elegant.
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:35 review Low quality posts
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:41
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:16 history answered TheDoctor CC BY-SA 3.0