Timeline for Weirdest way to produce a stack overflow [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
148 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Apr 18, 2016 at 23:22 | history | notice added | Dennis | Historical significance | |
S Apr 18, 2016 at 23:22 | history | locked | Dennis | ||
Apr 18, 2016 at 23:21 | history | closed | Dennis | Needs more focus | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 6:50 | answer | added | G. Sliepen | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 6:11 | history | edited | Martin Ender |
edited tags
|
|
May 27, 2015 at 17:08 | answer | added | Lucas | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 30, 2015 at 3:12 | history | edited | Alex A. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed little English details
|
Apr 18, 2015 at 20:46 | comment | added | ASCIIThenANSI | Here is the weirdest way to produce a StackOverflow. Get a time machine. Go back to 2008. Create a vote-based, community-run question-and-answer site about programming questions, where users can post their problems and get reliable results. Come back to your current time. Edit this post with the URL of your Q&A site. This should generate a StackOverflow. EDIT: I did it, here is my site: stackoverflow.com | |
Oct 24, 2014 at 16:48 | answer | added | Berkin | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 24, 2014 at 13:09 | answer | added | Luminous | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 14, 2014 at 6:42 | answer | added | ugoren | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 30, 2014 at 7:09 | history | protected | VisioN | ||
May 20, 2014 at 19:36 | answer | added | Jordan | timeline score: 0 | |
May 13, 2014 at 3:31 | answer | added | kernigh | timeline score: 4 | |
May 12, 2014 at 13:46 | answer | added | null | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 22, 2014 at 14:20 | answer | added | Thomas Baruchel | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 9:08 | answer | added | Johannes Kuhn | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 5, 2014 at 23:13 | history | edited | masterX244 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
Mar 5, 2014 at 23:10 | vote | accept | masterX244 | ||
Mar 5, 2014 at 14:14 | answer | added | Angelorf | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 2, 2014 at 2:26 | answer | added | buildist | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 1, 2014 at 12:55 | answer | added | Mark Jeronimus | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 26, 2014 at 20:12 | answer | added | n̴̖̋h̷͉̃a̷̭̿h̸̡̅ẗ̵̨́d̷̰̀ĥ̷̳ | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 26, 2014 at 17:28 | answer | added | Will Lp | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 26, 2014 at 15:51 | answer | added | Steven Hunt | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 26, 2014 at 12:35 | answer | added | Ray | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 26, 2014 at 11:45 | answer | added | Benjamin Gruenbaum | timeline score: 6 | |
Feb 26, 2014 at 9:34 | comment | added | Mark Jeronimus |
I used to have a program bug that called a super-method of an overridden method by accident, causing a stack-overflow by the EventDispatcher thread, but I can't remember where nor reproduce it.
|
|
Feb 25, 2014 at 23:22 | answer | added | Jonathan Cast | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 24, 2014 at 12:49 | answer | added | Charan | timeline score: -3 | |
Feb 23, 2014 at 9:43 | answer | added | Piotrek | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 23, 2014 at 5:55 | answer | added | davewp | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 23, 2014 at 4:43 | answer | added | Jyro117 | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 22, 2014 at 17:35 | answer | added | Salman Arshad | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 22, 2014 at 14:54 | answer | added | Salman Arshad | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 22, 2014 at 8:48 | answer | added | MathematicalOrchid | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 22, 2014 at 2:11 | answer | added | OneChillDude | timeline score: -1 | |
Feb 22, 2014 at 1:08 | comment | added | r3mainer | Drive a Toyota (Hey, wait a minute, my car is a Toyota...) | |
Feb 21, 2014 at 21:20 | comment | added | keshlam | I'm presuming that the goal is to cause an actual stack overflow, rather than to simply throw a StackOverflowError or whatever your language calls it. | |
Feb 21, 2014 at 13:00 | answer | added | abhink | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 21, 2014 at 12:51 | answer | added | Bakuriu | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 21, 2014 at 9:09 | answer | added | sectus | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 21, 2014 at 0:20 | answer | added | Kevin | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 16:29 | answer | added | fejesjoco | timeline score: 14 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 15:11 | answer | added | Thomas Weller | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 14:29 | answer | added | John Alexiou | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 13:40 | answer | added | kaar3k | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 13:24 | answer | added | bbozo | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 11:32 | answer | added | 18446744073709551615 | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 7:06 | answer | added | Trevor Powell | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 4:20 | answer | added | Joshua | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 2:11 | comment | added | TheDoctor | @TimSeguine - that sure sound like recursion to me! | |
Feb 20, 2014 at 0:28 | answer | added | Mooing Duck | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 20:38 | answer | added | Luke Woodward | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 20:18 | answer | added | SeanC | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 19:34 | answer | added | ɲeuroburɳ | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 18:50 | answer | added | Christopher King | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 15:44 | comment | added | Elist | #Quine# This is only an idea (one specific implementation in Java can be found here). A quine is a program that produces it's own code. If you take it a step further, you can make the code be saved to file and compiled during run time, then executed. This will not cause a classic StackOverFlow error, but a (much more risky...) disk memory overflow. | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 15:23 | answer | added | Elist | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 14:09 | answer | added | Paddy | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:10 | comment | added | robert | I'm partial to this method: joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/09/15.html | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 11:35 | answer | added | Vereos | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19 | answer | added | Siva | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 9:24 | answer | added | Ruslan | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 19, 2014 at 0:40 | answer | added | mdisibio | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 23:13 | answer | added | svidgen | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 22:31 | answer | added | bwDraco | timeline score: 41 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 21:20 | answer | added | John Alexiou | timeline score: 12 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 20:32 | comment | added | Tim Seguine | The weirdest way to produce a stack overflow is to post a popularity-contest on codegolf.stackexchange.com asking for people to post the weirdest way to produce a stack overflow. The responders, in testing their solutions to the question, will produce a stack overflow. I haven't tested it though, so I can't be sure it works (which is why I didn't post it as an answer). | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 20:20 | comment | added | masterX244 | post cause some compilers could accept it; (like the TeX example which relies on certain versions | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 20:19 | comment | added | Alec Teal | Hey does it have to compile? I have given an example of one that would overflow, but compilers will refuse to compile it because the behavior is never intended, not because it is semantically wrong. (C++ - constructor to construct temporary to pass to constructor causes infinite loop at runtime) | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 20:10 | answer | added | AMADANON Inc. | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 20:04 | answer | added | AMADANON Inc. | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 18:39 | comment | added | masterX244 | didnt knew that one thats why i asked @asgoth avoiding Internet Exploder since multiple years so the bugs didnt fgound a way into my memory | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 18:38 | comment | added | asgoth |
@masterX244 I mean, IE can produce javascript errors (e.g. stackoverflow at line 0 ), while the code runs fine in other browsers. My comment was meant to be sarcastic. Sorry if it failed.
|
|
Feb 18, 2014 at 18:07 | answer | added | Eric Lippert | timeline score: 32 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 17:53 | comment | added | masterX244 | @asgoth explain plz | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 17:48 | comment | added | asgoth | Use Internet Explorer. A sure way to catch one :) | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 17:43 | answer | added | user16727 | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 16:06 | answer | added | Ilya Gazman | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 13:36 | answer | added | bbozo | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 13:10 | answer | added | Roland Mai | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 12:45 | answer | added | jpjacobs | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 12:32 | answer | added | jpjacobs | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 12:29 | answer | added | Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen | timeline score: -3 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 12:03 | answer | added | Abhijit | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 11:35 | answer | added | masterX244 | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 10:39 | answer | added | Mike Pennington | timeline score: 0 | |
S Feb 18, 2014 at 9:04 | history | suggested | aalaap | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
'Stack Overflow' is a proper noun - I think you meant 'stack overflow' :-)
|
Feb 18, 2014 at 9:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 18, 2014 at 9:04 | |||||
Feb 18, 2014 at 8:48 | answer | added | bbozo | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 7:47 | answer | added | trutheality | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 5:35 | answer | added | Abhi.Net | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 5:12 | answer | added | MarkPflug | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 4:41 | comment | added | Jason C | @Quincunx Sure; sorry. | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 4:14 | comment | added | Justin | @JasonC You don't need to advertise your posts on this question with a comment. The OP owner will get a notification, and anyone who would upvote or such will find the answer without needing to read your comment. | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 3:41 | answer | added | Jason C | timeline score: 63 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 2:34 | answer | added | Joshua Taylor | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 2:24 | answer | added | Jim McKeeth | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 1:02 | answer | added | Ingo | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 18, 2014 at 0:48 | answer | added | recursive | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 22:39 | answer | added | BenM | timeline score: 30 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 20:00 | answer | added | Tobia | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 19:24 | answer | added | Ryan Cavanaugh | timeline score: 60 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 18:59 | answer | added | Toothbrush | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 18:55 | answer | added | devnull | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 18:07 | answer | added | Display Name | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 17:52 | answer | added | masterX244 | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 17:10 | answer | added | masterX244 | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 17:09 | answer | added | ntoskrnl | timeline score: 43 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:57 | answer | added | John Alexiou | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:44 | answer | added | VisioN | timeline score: 106 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:39 | answer | added | Justin Morgan | timeline score: 16 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:27 | answer | added | Art | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:16 | answer | added | TheDoctor | timeline score: 190 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:15 | answer | added | bwoebi | timeline score: 31 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 16:05 | answer | added | dipak | timeline score: 32 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 15:51 | comment | added | VisioN | There are many good (and short!) answers here: codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/9359/…. I hope nobody will copy those answers. | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 15:16 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 15:13 | answer | added | Paolo | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 14:35 | comment | added | Taemyr | It's too bad mailinator.blogspot.no/2009/06/beautiful-race-condition.html is just an infinite loop. | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 14:21 | answer | added | Shahbaz | timeline score: 77 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 14:12 | answer | added | Timtech | timeline score: 39 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:51 | answer | added | Alberto | timeline score: 10 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:46 | answer | added | devnull | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/435408271424630784 | ||
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:33 | answer | added | hvd | timeline score: 48 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:20 | answer | added | ntoskrnl | timeline score: 30 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:19 | comment | added | OJFord | I tend to produce by navigating to stackoverflow.com, though I have been known to query 'stack overflow' on my search engine of choice. | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:06 | answer | added | marinus | timeline score: 224 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:04 | answer | added | devnull | timeline score: 13 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 13:00 | answer | added | Sebastian Negraszus | timeline score: 11 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 12:59 | answer | added | devnull | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 12:23 | answer | added | ugoren | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 11:48 | answer | added | blabla999 | timeline score: 45 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 11:40 | answer | added | blabla999 | timeline score: 12 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 11:19 | history | edited | Victor Stafusa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Feb 17, 2014 at 11:11 | answer | added | unclemeat | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 11:09 | answer | added | ceased to turn counterclockwis | timeline score: 12 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 10:48 | answer | added | Victor Stafusa | timeline score: 62 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 10:19 | answer | added | Victor Stafusa | timeline score: 26 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 10:14 | answer | added | masterX244 | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 9:55 | answer | added | Michael Ehrenreich | timeline score: 57 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 9:36 | answer | added | ugoren | timeline score: 131 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 9:22 | answer | added | Justin | timeline score: 7 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 9:20 | answer | added | Justin | timeline score: 91 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 9:05 | answer | added | masterX244 | timeline score: 11 | |
Feb 17, 2014 at 8:57 | history | asked | masterX244 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |