Timeline for Lucky dice rolls
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
32 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 15:00 | answer | added | Giuseppe | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:59 | comment | added | Gábor Fekete | @tsh right, it's a 1-indexed range, I added it to make it clear. | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:58 | history | edited | Gábor Fekete | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 48 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 8:09 | answer | added | Olivier Grégoire | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 3:42 | comment | added | tsh | If I understand correctly: For a k faces dice, values on each faces would be 1 ~ k. Maybe this could be add to question specification. | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 21:01 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jun 15, 2020 at 20:36 | history | edited | Gábor Fekete | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 158 characters in body
|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 20:20 | history | edited | Gábor Fekete | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 20:18 | comment | added | Gábor Fekete | @Abigail Yes, I'm a [human] beep, boop. Both of you are right but as I specified that at least 3 decimal places are enough I didn't think this would raise any concerns. | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 20:11 | comment | added | Gábor Fekete | @Arnauld right, I just realized that, will add some more test cases, it should of course work for any integer. | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 19:38 | answer | added | Giuseppe | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 19:15 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 17:05 | answer | added | xash | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 16:29 | answer | added | l4m2 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 16:15 | comment | added | Noodle9 | @Abigail So you want the computer output edited by a human so it doesn't look like it came from a computer? | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 16:12 | comment | added | Abigail |
@Noodle9 I presume the OP is a human, not a binary device. No human should round the exact value of 1827 / 216 to 8.458333333333334.
|
|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 16:06 | comment | added | Noodle9 | @Abigail Why do you expect base-10 precision from a binary device? | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 16:06 | answer | added | Dominic van Essen | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:51 | comment | added | Abigail | @Noodle9 I expect the examples to be exact (up to rounding), and not to show some artifact from floating point arithmetic. | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:38 | comment | added | Arnauld | You may want to add a test case with \$|luck|>1\$. (Unless we always have \$|luck|\le1\$, in which case it should be specified.) | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:33 | comment | added | Noodle9 | @Abigail Time for you to read What every computer scientist should know about floating-point arithmetic. | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:32 | answer | added | Abigail | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:32 | answer | added | Arnauld | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:23 | answer | added | Xcali | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:04 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:01 | comment | added | Abigail |
Shouldn't the fourth example have 8.458333333333 as expected answer? Rounding should not result in a trailing 4.
|
|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/1272544411608547328 | ||
| Jun 15, 2020 at 14:06 | answer | added | ovs | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 13:50 | answer | added | RGS | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 13:24 | answer | added | Luis Mendo | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 13:16 | history | edited | Gábor Fekete | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 13:01 | history | asked | Gábor Fekete | CC BY-SA 4.0 |