Timeline for Divide them all [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 29, 2018 at 16:40 | comment | added | hyperneutrino♦ | @PeterTaylor I personally think that finding the decomposition on its own is much more competitive than finding the digits and then doing that whole reversal procedure, but it is a very similar challenge and doesn't really add too much new to the existing challenge | |
May 28, 2018 at 19:11 | review | Reopen votes | |||
May 28, 2018 at 21:18 | |||||
May 28, 2018 at 19:06 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | @HyperNeutrino, isn't the decomposition just the digits? Actually, on trying it, it seems to be the digits (except the leading +1) reversed. That's possibly accumulating enough trivial modifications (skip the first digit, reverse, also output the sum) to add up to something non-trivial, but it's still borderline. | |
May 28, 2018 at 18:55 | comment | added | Thomas Ayoub | @Arnauld you're right about 12, and the fact that the ouptut code must give both score & decomposition. I'll make my next questions proof-read | |
May 28, 2018 at 18:52 | history | edited | Thomas Ayoub | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
May 28, 2018 at 17:48 | comment | added | hyperneutrino♦ | @PeterTaylor I may be misinterpreting the challenge, but asking for the decomposition and asking for the digits seem like completely different tasks to me... | |
May 28, 2018 at 16:57 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | @HyperNeutrino, asking for the decomposition and its sum is a pretty minor variant on asking for the decomposition. | |
May 28, 2018 at 16:56 | history | closed |
Luis Mendo Peter Taylor code-golf Users with the code-golf badge or a synonym can single-handedly close code-golf questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. |
Duplicate of Balanced Ternary Converter | |
May 28, 2018 at 16:54 | review | Close votes | |||
May 28, 2018 at 16:57 | |||||
May 28, 2018 at 16:22 | answer | added | Dead Possum | timeline score: 1 | |
May 28, 2018 at 16:17 | comment | added | Arnauld |
Suggested test cases: 121: [ -1, -1, -1, -1 ] --> -4 , 122: [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 ] --> 5
|
|
May 28, 2018 at 16:10 | comment | added | Arnauld | @nimi I think that "given an integer input" overrides what's said in the quote from Math.SE. | |
May 28, 2018 at 16:06 | comment | added | nimi | Does our code have to include the "pick a random positive integer" part or can we take the number as input? | |
May 28, 2018 at 16:03 | answer | added | Arnauld | timeline score: 2 | |
May 28, 2018 at 14:46 | comment | added | hyperneutrino♦ | I personally don't think it's a dupe because the expected output isn't the bal-ternary representation so you still have to do a slightly different task. Very related though, I agree. | |
May 28, 2018 at 14:33 | comment | added | Thomas Ayoub | @MartinEnder it even sounds like a dup... I should enlarge my vocabulary in order to find them more easily. Thanks. | |
May 28, 2018 at 14:25 | history | edited | Martin Ender |
edited tags
|
|
May 28, 2018 at 14:25 | comment | added | Martin Ender | Related. (This challenge basically asks for the sum of digits of the balanced ternary representation.) | |
May 28, 2018 at 14:19 | history | asked | Thomas Ayoub | CC BY-SA 4.0 |