Timeline for Play tic-tac-toe and never lose
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
29 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2021 at 20:30 | answer | added | Samuel Waller | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 3, 2021 at 8:34 | answer | added | eligolf | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 4, 2018 at 15:05 | vote | accept | l4m2 | ||
| Jan 4, 2018 at 19:28 | answer | added | James Holderness | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 31, 2017 at 6:37 | answer | added | Zachary Cotton | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 31, 2017 at 6:26 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/947353163941777409 | ||
| Dec 31, 2017 at 3:53 | history | reopened |
Arnauld James Holderness MD XF totallyhuman user202729 |
||
| Dec 31, 2017 at 3:53 | history | edited | user202729 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; added 2 characters in body; deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2017 at 3:11 | history | edited | l4m2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 102 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2017 at 3:06 | comment | added | l4m2 | I guess that's what bonus do. I change it into "need to handle both, but can be two function " | |
| Dec 30, 2017 at 3:20 | comment | added | l4m2 | @Bruce Forte The program uses best stragety, but the other player may not | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 21:06 | comment | added | Riker | Don't do the bonus. Either require it or remove it, don't make it optional. The bonus ruins the challenge.. | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 20:38 | history | edited | l4m2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 386 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2017 at 18:36 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Dec 29, 2017 at 21:06 | |||||
| Dec 29, 2017 at 18:21 | history | edited | l4m2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2017 at 18:20 | comment | added | l4m2 | @James Holderness Yes you can. The original contain doesn't say "call for multiple times", and someone changed it. | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 16:38 | comment | added | James Holderness | Is it acceptable to provide an interactive program that repeatedly prompts the player for their move, each time outputting the program's counter move in response? I think that is the intent of option 2 of the allowed I/O, but it isn't entirely clear to me. | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 15:14 | history | closed |
Uriel Toto FlipTack Halvard Hummel user45941 |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 15:11 | comment | added | l4m2 | 'll change the problem when change is decided. Pure explanation that also exist in the problem doesn't lead to editing prob, either | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 14:17 | comment | added | user202729 | As a reminder, you should not change the challenge in the comment. | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 14:15 | comment | added | user202729 | @l4m2 Just restart the interpreter. Done. Why bother with it? It just unnecessarily increase the byte count for nothing. | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 14:14 | comment | added | totallyhuman | xkcd.com/832 | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 13:44 | history | edited | Arnauld | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added the point that was clarified in the comments
|
| Dec 29, 2017 at 13:20 | comment | added | l4m2 |
Why the In this case you can have a reset function or reset when the game is over part is removed? Function need to be called for multiple times, don't it?
|
|
| Dec 29, 2017 at 13:17 | comment | added | l4m2 |
If a losing is given to you then your solution is invalid. You are playing with other, so the chessboard won't instantly change, so we can assume that all previous moves of the 2nd player were also played by our engine
|
|
| Dec 29, 2017 at 10:00 | history | edited | Mr. Xcoder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
We don't play chess...
|
| Dec 29, 2017 at 9:45 | history | edited | user202729 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 160 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2017 at 8:37 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 29, 2017 at 15:14 | |||||
| Dec 29, 2017 at 7:59 | history | asked | l4m2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |