Skip to main content

Timeline for Polyglot the OEIS! [duplicate]

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

33 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jan 22, 2018 at 2:13 history edited MD XF CC BY-SA 3.0
added 116 characters in body
Aug 14, 2017 at 18:29 comment added SEJPM The version of this challenge with constant sequences banned lives here now.
Aug 14, 2017 at 10:32 history closed Mayube
Business Cat
user45941
user58826
SEJPM
Duplicate of The Versatile Integer Printer
Aug 13, 2017 at 2:27 comment added user58826 Meta discussion about dupe
Aug 11, 2017 at 0:16 answer added MD XF timeline score: 0
Aug 10, 2017 at 4:15 answer added MD XF timeline score: 2
Aug 9, 2017 at 9:43 answer added Mayube timeline score: 2
Aug 8, 2017 at 19:16 comment added The Fifth Marshal Look at the (currently) winning answer; it uses almost all constant sequences.
Aug 8, 2017 at 16:43 review Close votes
Aug 8, 2017 at 17:09
Aug 8, 2017 at 16:13 history reopened Stephen
MD XF
hyperneutrino
Dead Possum
Business Cat
Aug 8, 2017 at 16:09 comment added MD XF I don't think this is a dupe. People (including me) choose to wimp out and use constant sequences. It's not supposed to be that way and it doesn't have to. Answers from there are sometimes valid here, yes, but answers here are not necessarily valid there. This is nothing like the polyglot answer-chaining challenge, but I could take that polyglot and win this challenge.
Aug 8, 2017 at 16:07 comment added Stephen I really don't think this is a dupe, especially because of the difference in scoring.
Aug 8, 2017 at 12:28 comment added SEJPM For the uninitiated reader: This question was closed as a duplicate because entries from "the versatile integer printer" are valid and (highly) competitive here as well and because newer challenges generally get closed in favor of old ones.
Aug 8, 2017 at 9:21 history closed The Fifth Marshal
AdmBorkBork
Wheat Wizard
Toto
Blue
Duplicate of The Versatile Integer Printer
Aug 8, 2017 at 3:00 answer added Conor O'Brien timeline score: 3
Aug 7, 2017 at 15:53 comment added SEJPM @ppperry I have to disagree: While every entry from there will be a valid entry here, the reverse is not true. Here all entries have much more freedom and can use non-trivial sequences. Examples I have seen in the two most competetitives answers include the even numbers, the prime numbers, the squares, the non-negative integers and the cubic numbers.
Aug 7, 2017 at 15:40 review Close votes
Aug 7, 2017 at 17:08
Aug 7, 2017 at 8:17 answer added Mr. Xcoder timeline score: 12
Aug 7, 2017 at 2:32 answer added Business Cat timeline score: 22
Aug 7, 2017 at 0:07 comment added SEJPM @ThePirateBay different versions do count as different languages (see point 4 of "Any final Words / Rules?"). As for the implementations, I can't find any prior ruling on this particular question. However as they practically define different languages, you can count them as different (but have to specify the interpreter as well). This also makes sense here because you'd have to squeeze different sequences out of the implementations ;)
Aug 7, 2017 at 0:06 history edited SEJPM CC BY-SA 3.0
imported the ruling from meta, removed the distinction for major revisions
Aug 6, 2017 at 22:32 answer added MD XF timeline score: 39
Aug 6, 2017 at 22:13 history edited MD XF CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body
Aug 6, 2017 at 22:02 answer added Business Cat timeline score: 4
Aug 6, 2017 at 22:00 answer added fireflame241 timeline score: 28
Aug 6, 2017 at 21:35 comment added user72349 Do different versions/implementations of the same language count as different langauges (like Python2 and Python3, or like browser JS and Node.js)?
Aug 6, 2017 at 21:02 answer added Luis Mendo timeline score: 8
Aug 6, 2017 at 20:38 history tweeted twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/894296608057249792
Aug 6, 2017 at 19:49 answer added steenbergh timeline score: 2
Aug 6, 2017 at 19:26 answer added steenbergh timeline score: 6
Aug 6, 2017 at 18:55 comment added Okx The fact that it's mots sequence/language pairs seems kind of weird.
Aug 6, 2017 at 18:11 history asked SEJPM CC BY-SA 3.0