How it works (WIP)
If n = 13 (a twin prime), (n + n%6 - 3)n = 3(3 + 3 - 3) = 9 has two divisors (3 and 9) in [2, 12).
If n > 3 is a twin prime, as seen before, m := n + n%6 - 3 is its twin. In this case, mn has exactly four divisors: 1, m, n, mn.
Since n > 3, we have m > 4, so 4n < mn and exactly two divisors (m and n) fall into the integerinterval [2, 4n).
If n = 1, then (n + n%6 - 3)n = 1 + 1 - 3 = -1 has no divisors in [2, 4).
If n = 2, the integerthen (n + n%6 - 3)n = 2(2 + 2 - 3) = 2 has one divisor (itself) in [2, 8).
If n = 34 (a twin prime), the integerthen (n + n%6 - 3)n = 34(34 + 34 - 3) = 920 has twofour divisors (32, 4, 5, and 910) in [2, 1216).
If n => 4 is even, 2, the integern/2, and n all divide n and, therefore, (n + n%6 - 3)n = 4(4 + 4 - 3) = 20 has four divisors. We have (n/2, > 2 since n > 4, 5, 10), so there are at least three divisors in [2, 164n).
If n = 69, the integerthen (n + n%6 - 3)n = 69(69 + 03 - 3) = 1881 has fivethree divisors (2, 3, 6, 9, 183, 9, and 21) in [2, 2436).
If n > 39 is a twin primemultiple of 3, as seen beforethen 3, m := nn/3, and n all divide n and, therefore, (n + n%6 - 3)n is its twin. In this case,We have mnn/3 > 3 has exactly foursince n > 9, so there are at least three divisors: in 1, m, n[2, mn4n).
SinceFinally, if n = 6k ± 1 > 4 is not a twin prime, either n or m := n + n%6 - 3 must be composite and, we havetherefore, admit a proper divisor d > 1.
Since either n = m + 2 or m = n + 2 and n, m > 4, sothe integers 4n < mnd, m, and exactly twon are distinct divisors of (mn. Furthermore, m < n + 3 < 4n andsince n > 1) fall into the interval, so mn has at least three divisors in [2, 4n).