Timeline for Am I a Fibonacci Number?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 19:13 | history | edited | Jonathan Allan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 19:00 | comment | added | Christian Legge | @JonathanAllan I think you're right. There's an atom that generates a range that starts from zero, but it only goes to n-1, which is too small for this, even with the increment (going from 0 to n). I've been trying to find a one byte atom that can make a number bigger than that, but they're all either not big enough (e.g., increment) or don't work on 0 (e.g., double). If there were an "increment by 10" atom or something like that, that would be perfect... | |
| Jun 14, 2017 at 18:58 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan | @FryAmTheEggman yeah 2 is truthy :) | |
| Jun 14, 2017 at 18:58 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan |
@Christian (weird no notification) yeah you're right it's the zeroth, which means it can be 0r‘, I dont think I can save a byte from that fact though...
|
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 18:55 | comment | added | FryAmTheEggman | It doesn't appear to be relevant based on the wording of the challenge, but if you use the count atom with 1 as your argument on the list of Fibonacci numbers the result is 2 (not 1). | |
| Jun 14, 2017 at 18:08 | comment | added | Christian Legge | Are you sure about that last note? When I run the Fibonacci atom on a list starting from 0, 0 is included in the output. | |
| Jun 14, 2017 at 18:04 | history | edited | Jonathan Allan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 17:45 | history | edited | Jonathan Allan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 17:34 | history | edited | Jonathan Allan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 592 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 17:26 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | Oh whoops...Fibonacci is weird. (btw deleted my answer then if u say so) | |
| Jun 14, 2017 at 17:22 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan |
Oh, I golfed mine down to yours, except mine works for 3 :)
|
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 17:20 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | Umm, this looks too much like my answer... | |
| Jun 14, 2017 at 17:18 | history | edited | Jonathan Allan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2017 at 17:12 | history | answered | Jonathan Allan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |