Timeline for Output with the same length as the code
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 21, 2019 at 23:56 | comment | added | GammaFunction | I figured you did, I'm happy to clarify. | |
| Aug 21, 2019 at 17:00 | comment | added | Digital Trauma | @GammaFunction Sorry - I misunderstood the meaning of the "-1" in your comment - I'm used to those meaning downvote and a comment explaining why. | |
| Aug 21, 2019 at 16:30 | comment | added | GammaFunction |
I don't see uname as a builtin. When I said "-1, and actually a builtin", I meant "This answer uses umask for -1 bytes, and umask is actually a builtin".
|
|
| Aug 21, 2019 at 16:27 | comment | added | Digital Trauma |
@GammaFunction Where do you see uname as a bash builtin? Every distro I can lay my hands on right now it is a separate binary, including TIO. Conversely, as your linked answer shows, umask is a builtin in most/all shells.
|
|
| Aug 18, 2019 at 3:12 | comment | added | GammaFunction | -1, and actually a builtin | |
| S Aug 15, 2019 at 12:35 | history | suggested | TheOnlyMrCat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
(followed by a newline)
|
| Aug 15, 2019 at 5:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 15, 2019 at 12:35 | |||||
| May 25, 2017 at 11:13 | comment | added | Jason Musgrove |
Technically uname isn't a bash builtin - it's a separate executable
|
|
| May 17, 2017 at 16:04 | history | edited | Digital Trauma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 17, 2017 at 16:02 | history | answered | Digital Trauma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |