Timeline for Surprise Party for Brain-Flak
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 at 12:41 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
| May 5, 2017 at 12:39 | comment | added | user63187 | @EriktheOutgolfer what? How did that happen | |
| May 5, 2017 at 11:50 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | @Christopher It seems like the code you have is my number and not yours though. | |
| May 5, 2017 at 11:38 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | @Christopher Huh? I don't think it did that. Anyways, I'll update soon. | |
| May 5, 2017 at 11:34 | comment | added | user63187 | @EriktheOutgolfer I only really golfed 2 bytes off the program. At the beginning it did +-- and I fixed it to - | |
| May 5, 2017 at 10:40 | comment | added | user63187 | @EriktheOutgolfer tio.run/nexus/… | |
| May 5, 2017 at 10:20 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | @Christopher Can you give me a link to the original BF script so that I can test it? | |
| May 4, 2017 at 23:03 | comment | added | user63187 | I golfed a few trillion bytes off. Nothing much | |
| May 4, 2017 at 23:02 | comment | added | user63187 | 1814382933791978604180811513276951596891496241887282518341046923729565882935872511161361237442639477201197909462276216213505390716388781699995156144914006643460505208562917269884967739569849775334582997489357826941308223133279896950569038552439752566374191225909282002406578832005197375356729715483875184532677626663572228849651637974329845225525069790860 brackets works better for less bytes | |
| May 1, 2017 at 7:46 | history | edited | Erik the Outgolfer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
end=no not 2 only 3
|
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:35 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | @LeakyNun I never asked you to retract it :) | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:33 | comment | added | Leaky Nun | Alright, it's valid then (but that doesn't mean I'll retract my downvote). | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:32 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer |
@LeakyNun I used this tool to compress the BF code, it's not just a bunch of +'s, but this is Lenguage, so the number is too large.
|
|
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:29 | comment | added | Leaky Nun |
Pretty sure the brainfuck code behind this is not golfed, probably generated using a bunch of +'s, but I won't bother to confirm.
|
|
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:27 | history | edited | Leaky Nun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 81 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:22 | comment | added | Riker | well, it could be considered invalid under "not golfed", as the BF code it translates to would be significantly shorter, but I dunno about that. | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:20 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | @Riker I just asked because I'm inexperienced with Lenguage, and it's questionable whether this is actually valid. | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:19 | comment | added | Riker | yes, I don't mean to say it's not valid. It still can be a bad answer though. | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:19 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | @Riker Well, someone had to post it anyways, only Brain-Flak variants are disallowed. | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:17 | comment | added | Riker | It's boring as hell though. It should be pretty obvious why it's been downvoted. Just because it's valid doesn't mean it's not boring or an abuse of the rules. | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:14 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | Huh? Why the downvotes? This answer is valid. The question doesn't explicitly forbid answers in trivial languages, it just encourages you to write it in a language where it would be non-trivial. | |
| Apr 30, 2017 at 14:13 | history | answered | Erik the Outgolfer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |