Timeline for 8 ought to become Infinity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 21:00 | comment | added | Patrick Roberts | @Qwertiy thanks for pointing that out, and yes for the older version I completely agree with your comments. | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 19:04 | comment | added | Qwertiy | @PatrickRoberts, my comment was about an older version. Check edit history for more details. | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 19:55 | comment | added | Marcus Dirr | Like I said, as far as I can tell. I saw the global variable way after making that comment and kicked myself. | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 18:50 | comment | added | Qwertiy |
Actually there are some ways. Way with global variable is already posted, bute there are some more, allowing var in the loop.
|
|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 16:30 | history | edited | Marcus Dirr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 457 characters in body
|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 15:41 | comment | added | Marcus Dirr | As far as I can tell, it isn't possible to do what the challenge with a C-style for loop in Javascript unless you break a rule - either by having something inside it (like my solution) or by pre-massaging the loop declaration in your clean code (like with Cedric Reichenbach's). | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 15:23 | comment | added | Marcus Dirr | Darn, missed that - I'll have to figure something out. | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 15:20 | comment | added | Qwertiy | "loop behavior should be the same in case of empty loop" | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 15:13 | history | edited | Marcus Dirr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 132 characters in body
|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 14:53 | history | answered | Marcus Dirr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |