# Cubically 6x6x6, 14 bytes, [cracked](https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/156039/61563) by H.PWiz

    [+1[+7]35@]100

Per [this](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/13660/61563) meta post, Cubically with the `-6` flag counts as a completely different language (Cubically 6x6x6) than with the `-5` flag (Cubically 5x5x5), which is again different from the default language (Cubically 3x3x3).

Cubically 6x6x6 does not have its own wrapper on TIO (i.e. there is no [tio.run/#cubically-6x6x6](https://tio.run/#cubically-6x6x6)), but the language itself is on TIO; it simply requires the `-6` flag. I believe this is valid due to the linked meta post and the fact that the language is on TIO, but simply needs more to run than just one of the `/srv/wrappers` scripts.

Dennis' [8cc answer](https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/155533/61563) acts similarly; the language is on TIO, but it requires multiple commands and command-line flags, none of which were specified in the answer.