It's fun to stay at the Y.M.C.A

Question

"Y.M.C.A." is a popular disco song by the Village People that has a well-known dance. Write the shortest program to output the capital letters "Y", "M", "C", and "A" synchronized to the song's chorus.

Generally, one letter goes on each line sent to standard output. This primarily is to simplify programs subject to the output buffering of the C standard library (printing a newline flushes the output buffer), so you may omit any or all of these newlines if such omission would make your program shorter.

Your program, which is started at the same time as the music, must output the letter "Y" within 0.125 s of each of these times after starting (in seconds; I determined these from the music video posted on YouTube).

 45.766   49.611   60.889
 64.661  109.816  113.591
124.810  128.687  173.830
177.620  188.950  192.724
204.013  207.739  219.057

The letters "M", "C", and "A" respectively come 0.930 s, 1.395 s, and 1.628 s after each "Y". For testing purposes, these relative times are converted into absolute times by adding them to the time of the preceding "Y".

I have written a test program and corresponding example program in C that assume a newline follows each letter (although this is not a rule of competition). It is written for Linux and will not work on Windows without using Cygwin. If you cannot test your submission using the test program, at least check your submission against the YouTube video.

If your submission requires a special command-line option to behave properly, that command-line option counts when calculating your score. However, any interpreter startup time does not count against you, and the test program can be modified to accommodate that if necessary.

Although I doubt one exists, I must say that using a programming language function or library designed specifically for this task is prohibited.

Answer 1

Ruby 180 135 124 118 108 104

[458,k=22,*[97,k,435,k]*2,*[98,k]*2,98].flat_map{|e|[e,9,5,2]}.zip(%w(Y M C A)*15){|a,b|sleep a/1e1;p b}

Answer 2

C, 161 154 chars

#define P(d,x)w(d);puts(#x);
w(n){usleep(n<<16);}
y(d){P(d,Y)P(14,M)P(7,C)P(3,A)}
b(){y(664);y(35);y(147);y(35);}
main(){b(b(b(w(34))));y(148);y(33);y(148);}

The tester passes, but only if fflush(stdout); is added after each puts. Since the question clearly states that fflush is not required, I take it as a problem in the tester.

Logic:
w sleeps, the time is given in units of 16.384 65.536 ms. This resolution allows accurate enough timing and small constants (I should perhaps try 100ms).
P waits a while and prints a character.
y prints a YMCA sequence, after an initial delay.
b prints 4 YMCA sequences - this 4*YMCA happens 3 times, with similar enough timing.
main prints the 3*4*YMCA sequences, plus the remaining 3.

Answer 3

Python2.6 (82)(214)(219)(196)(185)(152)

Fixed. Ran against the video & seems accurate. Saved quiet a few characters by reducing the precision from 3 to 2 in most of the cases(thanks for the tip @JPvdMerwe).

The only problem is that the tester shows a huge discrepancy in the timings. It starts out of sync & tries to come back into sync. In the two test cases it was more than 175 seconds out of sync at the beginning and came back to within 0.342 and 0.451 seconds of being back in sync.

import time;s=time.sleep
for t in[45.8,2.1,9.5,2,43.4,2,9.5,2.1,43.4,2,9.6,2,9.5,2,9.6]*15:
 i=0;s(t)
 while i<4:s([.1,.9,.5,.2][i]);print'YMCA'[i];i+=1

Answer 4

Mathematica, 157

p=Print[Pause@#;#2]&

(#~p~"Y";.93~p~"M";.465~p~"C";.233~p~"A")&/@{45.766,2.217,9.65,2.144,43.527,2.147,9.591,2.249,43.515,2.162,9.702,2.146,9.661,2.098,9.69}

I watched the entire video to confirm the timing. Y M C A.... Y M C A...

It could be shorter with less precision, but then I'd have to watch the video again to confirm that it was not off by more than .125 at the end. lol

Answer 5

JavaScript (Node.js), 206 bytes

s=async t=>await new Promise(r=>setTimeout(r,t*1e3));(async _=>{for(t of[45.8,2.1,9.5,2,43.4,2,9.5,2.1,43.4,2,9.6,2,9.5,2,9.6])for(i=0,await s(t);i<4;)await s([.1,.9,.5,.2][i])||console.log('YMCA'[i++])})()

Try it online!

i tried out the tester program and it was within about half a second for each cue but not 0.125. i think the startup time just needs to be factored in and some of the deltas may need to be adjusted to account for accumulated rounding errors.

i'm curious if there may be a shorter solution without using >ES5 await, and a shorter way to print to STDOUT.