What general tips do you have for golfing in Python? I'm looking for ideas which can be applied to code-golf problems and which are also at least somewhat specific to Python (e.g. "remove comments" is not an answer).
Please post one tip per answer.
What general tips do you have for golfing in Python? I'm looking for ideas which can be applied to code-golf problems and which are also at least somewhat specific to Python (e.g. "remove comments" is not an answer).
Please post one tip per answer.
If you want to know the type of a variable x:
x*0is 0 # -> integer
x*0==0 # -> float (if the previous check fails)
x*0=="" # -> string
x*0==[] # -> array
use os.urandom()
as a random source instead of random.randint()
ord()
to get a number instead of character? len("ord(os.urandom(1))")
-> 18
and len("random.randint()")
-> 16
\$\endgroup\$
– jscs
May 1 '11 at 3:10
import random
vs import os
. randint() needs 3 parameters anyway. If you need a list of random numbers, you can use map(ord,os.urandom(N))
Also, sometimes, you actually need a random char instead of a number
\$\endgroup\$
– gnibbler
May 1 '11 at 7:17
id(id)
, substituting the inner id
with any 3-letter builtin if you need more than one. 'abc'[id(id)%3]
is 11 characters shorter than 'abc'[random.randrange(3)]
, not even counting the import statement.
\$\endgroup\$
– Fraxtil
Apr 20 '13 at 2:04
id
can be applied on mostly everything, such as 1
or []
.
\$\endgroup\$
– user202729
Jul 5 '18 at 9:41
Combining with this tip, suppose you have a situation like
for _ in[0]*x:doSomething()
a="blah"
You can instead do:
for a in["blah"]*x:doSomething()
to skip out on a variable assignment. However, be aware that
exec"doSomething();"*x;a="blah"
in Python 2 is just shorter, so this only really saves in cases like assigning a char (via "c"*x
) or in Python 3.
However, where things get fun is with Python 2 list comprehensions, where this idea still works due to a quirk with list comprehension scope:
[doSomething()for a in["blah"]*x]
(Credits to @xnor for expanding the former, and @Lembik for teaching me about the latter)
Use powers of the imaginary unit to calculate sines and cosines.
For example, given an angle d
in degrees, you can calculate the sine and cosine as follows:
p=1j**(d/90.)
s=p.real
c=p.imag
This can also be used for related functions such as the side length of a unit n
-gon:
l=abs(1-1j**(4./n))
You can split a list into chunks of a given size using zip
and iter
, as explained in this SO question.
>>> l=range(12)
>>> zip(*[iter(l)]*4)
[(0, 1, 2, 3), (4, 5, 6, 7), (8, 9, 10, 11)]
Of course, substituting in l
as zip(*[iter(range(12))]*4)
gives the same result.
The 4
is the number of elements per chunk. If the length isn't a multiple of this, any elements in the remainder are not included. For example, l=range(13)
would give the same result.
The result is a list of tuples. If your input is a string and you want to produce a list of strings, you can do
>>> l="Code_golf"
>>> map(''.join,zip(*[iter(l)]*3))
['Cod', 'e_g', 'olf'] # Python 3 would give a map object
When the list l
is defined by a list comprehension, instead of converting to an iterable as iter(l)
, you can instead write it as a generator comprehension with (...)
instead of [...]
.
>>> l=(n for n in range(18)if n%3!=1)
>>> zip(*[l]*4)
[(0, 2, 3, 5), (6, 8, 9, 11), (12, 14, 15, 17)]
This consumes the generator, so l
will appear empty afterwards. Note as before that we can inline l
as zip(*[(n for n in range(18)if n%3!=1)]*4)
.
Abuse the fact that in case of an expression yielding True
boolean operators return the first value that decides about the outcome of the expression instead of a boolean:
>>> False or 5
5
is pretty straightforward. For a more complex example:
>>> i = i or j and "a" or ""
i's value remains unchanged if it already had a value set, becomes "a" if j has a value or in any other case becomes an empty string (which can usually be omitted, as i most likely already was an empty string).
Lets play with some list tricks
a=[5,5,5,5,5,5,5]
can be written as:
a=[5]*7
It can be expanded in this way. Lets, say we need to do something like
for i in range(0,100,3):a[i]=5
Now using the slicing trick we can simply do:
a[0:100:3]=[5]*(1+99//3)
a[:100:3]=[5]*34
\$\endgroup\$
– AMK
Dec 16 '13 at 18:57
Say you want to apply f
composed k
times to the number 1
, then print the result.
This can be done via an exec
loop,
n=1
exec("n=f(n);"*k)
print(n)
which runs code like n=1;n=f(n);n=f(n);n=f(n);n=f(n);n=f(n);print(n)
.
But, it's one character shorter to use eval
print(eval("f("*k+'1'+")"*k))
which evaluates code like f(f(f(f(f(1)))))
and prints the result.
This does not save chars in Python 2 though, where exec
doesn't need parens but eval
still does. It does still help though when f(n)
is an expression in which n
appears only once as the first or last character, letting you use only one string multiplication.
Usually you use map
to transform a collection
>> map(ord,"abc")
[97, 98, 99]
But you can also use it to repeatedly act on object by a built-in method that modifies it.
>> L=[1,2,3,4,5]
>> map(L.remove,[4,2])
[None, None]
>> L
[1, 3, 5]
Be aware that the calls are done in order, so earlier ones might mess up later ones.
>> L=[1,2,3,4,5]
>> map(L.pop,[0,1])
[1, 3]
>> L
[2, 4, 5]
Here, we intended to extract the first two elements of L
, but after extracting the first, the next second element is the original third one. We could sort the indices in descending order to avoid this.
An advantage of the evaluation-as-action is that it can be done inside of a lambda
. Be careful in Python 3 though, where map
objects are not evaluated immediately. You might need an expression like 0in map(...)
to force evaluation.
A detailed guide
I had worked with short-circuiting and/or
's for a while without really grasping how they work, just using b and x or y
just as a template. I hope this detailed explanation will help you understand them and use them more flexibly.
Recursive named lambda
functions are often shorter than programs that loop. For evaluation to terminate, there must be control flow to prevent a recursive call for the base case. Python has a ternary condition operator that fits the bill.
f=lambda x:base_value if is_base_case else recursive_value
Note that list selection won't work because Python evaluates both options. Also, regular if _:
isn't an option because we're in a lambda
.
Python has another option to short-circuit, the logical operator keywords and
and or
. The idea is that
True or b == True
False and b == False
so Python can skip evaluate b
in these cases because the result is known. Think of the evaluation of a or b
as "Evaluate a
. If it's True, output a
. Otherwise, evaluate and output b
." So, it's equivalent to write
a or b
a if a else b
It's the same for a or b
except we stop if a
is False.
a and b
a if (not a) else b
You might wonder why we didn't just write False if (not a) else b
. The reason is that this works for non-Boolean a
. Such values are first converted to a Boolean. The number 0
, None
, and the empty list/tuple/set become False
, and are so called "Falsey". The rest are "Truthy".
So, a or b
and a and b
always manages to produce either a
or b
, while forming a correct Boolean equation.
(0 or 0) == 0
(0 or 3) == 3
(2 or 0) == 2
(2 or 3) == 2
(0 and 0) == 0
(0 and 3) == 0
(2 and 0) == 0
(2 and 3) == 3
('' or 3) == 3
([] and [1]) == []
([0] or [1]) == [0]
Now that we understand Boolean short-circuiting, let's use it in recursive functions.
f=lambda x:base_value if is_base_case else recursive_value
The simplest and most common situation is when the base is something like f("") = ""
, sending a Falsey value to itself. Here, it suffices to do x and
with the argument.
For example, this function doubles each character in a string, f("abc") == "aabbcc"
.
f=lambda s:s and s[0]*2+f(s[1:])
Or, this recursively sums the cubes of numbers 1 through n
, so f(3)==36
.
f=lambda n:n and n**3+f(n-1)
Another common situation is for your function to take non-negative numbers to lists, with a base case of 0
giving the empty list. We need to transform the number to a list while preserving Truthiness. One way is n*[5]
, where the list can be anything nonempty. This seems silly, but it works.
So, the following returns the list [1..n]
.
f=lambda n:n*[5]and f(n+1)+[n]
Note that negative n
will also give the empty list, which works here, but not always. For strings, it's similar with any non-empty string. If you've previously defined such a value, you can save chars by using it.
More generally, when your base value is an empty list, you can use the arithmetic values True == 1
and False == 0
to do:
[5]*(is_not_base_case)and ...
TODO: Truthy base value
TODO: and/or
and
and or
work might be: x or y=if x:return x;return y
x and y:if x:return y;return x
\$\endgroup\$
– fejfo
Jan 11 '18 at 19:47
One trick I have encountered concerns returning or printing Yes/No answers:
print 'YNeos'[x::2]
x is the condition and can take value 0 or 1.
I found this rather brilliant.
A condition like
s = ''
if c:
s = 'a'
can be written as
s = c*'a'
and there is possibly a need for parenthesis for condition.
This can also be combined with other conditions as (multiple ifs)
s = c1*'a' + c2*'b'
or (multiple elifs)
s = c1*'a' or c2*'b'
For example FizzBuzz problem's solution will be
for i in range(n):
print((i%3<1)*"Fizz"+(i%5<1)*"Buzz" or i)
List comprehension.
shortList = []
for x in range(10):
shortList += [x * 2]
can be shortened into
shortList = [x*2 for x in range(10)]
Or even shorter:
shortList = range(0,20,2)
If you are doing something small in a for loop whose only purpose is to invoke a side effect (pop
, print
in Python 3, append
), it might be possible to translate it to a list-comprehension. For example, from Keith Randall's answer here, in the middle of a function, hence the indent:
if d>list('XXXXXXXXX'):
for z in D:d.pop()
c=['X']
Can be converted to:
if d>list('XXXXXXXXX'):
[d.pop()for z in D]
c=['X']
Which then allows this golf:
if d>list('XXXXXXXXX'):[d.pop()for z in D];c=['X']
An if
within a for
works just as well:
for i in range(10):
if is_prime(i):d.pop()
can be written as
[d.pop()for i in range(10)if is_prime(i)]
Your submission can be a method of an object
range(123,790,111).count
This defines an anonymous function much shorter than
lambda n:range(123,790,111).count(n)
The object method is a valid function that meets our definition. For example, it could be bound and called
f=range(123,790,111).count
print f(99)
Because it avoids a costly lambda
, this saves characters even rewriting from
lambda n:n in range(123,790,111)
Consider using an object method when your solution is a simple two-input function of your input and some concrete object. You can use dir()
to get a list of methods of an object. Note in particular methods like .__add__
that are called for an operator like +
. Most infix operators correspond to a method.
Other examples:
"prefix{}suffix".format
lambda s:"prefix"+s+"suffix"
2 .__rpow__ #Space for lexer
lambda n:n*n
[0,0].__le__
lambda l:[0,0]<=l
["North","East","South","West"].pop
lambda n:["North","East","South","West"][n]
You can even something save bytes with two input by currying. For example, compare
lambda l:expression_in_l.count
lambda n,l:n in expression_in_l
where expression_in_l
produces a list with no duplicates and has favorable spacing and precedence.
["North","East","South","West"].pop
a function submission must work multiple times, no? using .__getitem__
would do the trick, but the length would be the same
\$\endgroup\$
– Felipe Nardi Batista
Jul 12 '17 at 13:51
When mapping a function on a list in Python 3, instead of doing [f(x)for x in l]
or list(map(f,l))
, do [*map(f,l)]
.
It works for all other functions returning generators too (like filter
).
The best solution is still switching to Python 2 though
Format() works on dates:
"We are in year: %s" % (date.strftime('%y'))
Becomes:
"We are in year: {:%y}".format(date)
Or even better with f-strings:
f"We are in year: {date:%y}"
Check whether a positive integer n
is a perfect power of 2, that is one of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ...
, with any of these expression:
n&~-n<1
n&-n==n
2**n%n<1
This is shorter than converting to binary or using a loop. The last one also works for checking, say, powers of 3.
Sometimes you need convert boolean expression into integer (0/1)
Simple use this Boolean (in examples below c > 0
) in ariphmetic
a=b+(c>0)
a+=c>0
a=sum(c>0 for c in b) # space in "0 for" may be omitted
And sometimes you need simple convert boolean to int (for example for printing or convert to binary string). In programm you may use some variants
1 if c>0 else 0
c>0and 1or 0
(0,1)[c>0]
int(c>0)
but shortest way is
+(c>0)
+c
being shorter. E.g. let c
be a boolean, then 4+c
is 5 if c
is True else 4.
\$\endgroup\$
– MyGGaN
Feb 25 '14 at 23:41
To concatenate strings or characters, it can be shorter to repeatedly append to the empty string than to join
.
23 chars
s=""
for x in l:s+=f(x)
25 chars
s="".join(f(x)for x in l)
Assume here that f(x)
stands for some expression in x
, so you can't just map
.
But, the join
may be shorter if the result doesn't need saving to a variable or if the for
takes newlines or indentation.
For a dictionary with string keys which also happen to be valid Python variable names, you can get a saving if there's at least three items by using dict
's keyword arguments:
{'a':1,'e':4,'i':9}
dict(a=1,e=4,i=9)
The more string keys you have, the more quote characters you'll save, so this is particularly beneficial for large dictionaries (e.g. for a kolmogorov challenge).
When squaring single letter variables, it is shorter to times it by itself
>>> x=30
>>> x*x
900
Is one byte shorter than
>>> x=30
>>> x**2
900
If transforming from list to a tuple or set to a set, list or tuple is needed, as of Python 3.5 you can use the splat operator:
tuple(iterable) -> (*iterable,) (-3 bytes)
set(iterable) -> {*iterable} (-2 bytes)
list(iterable) -> [*iterable] (-3 bytes)
If you're doing this as well as appending/prepending, you can do the following for an extra bonus:
iterable+[1] -> *iterable,1 (-2 bytes, 3 for tuples)
iterable+iter2 -> *iterable,*iterable2 (+1 byte, 0 for tuples, though can combine types)
[1]+iterable+[1] -> 1,*iterable,1 (-3 bytes, -4 for tuples)
iterable+[1]+iter2 -> *iterable,1,*iter2 (0 bytes, -1 for tuples)
Basically, ,*
instead of ,
gives a +1 byte penalty and ,
instead of ,[]
gives -2 bytes.
This shows [1,*iterable,1]
is a golfier way of doing [1]+iterable+[1]
by one byte, even when we're not doing any type conversion.
And just for fun, {*{}}
is the same length as set()
for challenges without letters.
set()
(e.g. ...and set()
can become ...and{*{}}
). Oh, and it can be replaced with {*()}
or {*[]}
if an empty dict
feels unsettling. ;-)
\$\endgroup\$
– Erik the Outgolfer
Jun 29 '18 at 22:37
if isdigit(a) and isdigit(b) and isdigit(c)
if all(map(isdigit,[a,b,c]))
filter(function, iterable) returns a list of all the elements of
iterable` for which function
is a True
-y value and a non-empty list is True
-y, so this can be shortened further to if filter(isdigit,[a,b,c])
\$\endgroup\$
– undergroundmonorail
Apr 16 '14 at 8:33
if filter(isdigit,[a,b,c])
is not equivalent to the code in the answer; but it would be if @moose used isdigit(a) or...
and if any(...
.
\$\endgroup\$
– undergroundmonorail
Apr 21 '15 at 13:36
If you need to import a lot of modules you can reassign __import__
to something shorter, this also has the advantage of being able to name imports anything you want.
i=__import__;s=i('string');x=i('itertools');
import string,itertools
, import string,itertools as M
, from itertools import*
and other variants tend to be shorter...
\$\endgroup\$
– Sp3000
Jul 25 '15 at 9:05
s,i=map(__import__,['string','itertools'])
is shorter than your example, but still longer than import string as s,itertools as i
\$\endgroup\$
– Felipe Nardi Batista
Jul 12 '17 at 14:44
Cut out newlines wherever you can.
At the top-level, it doesn't matter.
a=1
b=9
Takes the same amount of characters as:
a=1;b=9
In the first case you have a newline instead of a ;
. But in function bodies, you save however deep the nesting level is:
def f():
a=1;b=9
Actually in this case, you can have them all on one line:
def f():a=1;b=9
If you have an if
or a for
, you can likewise have everything on one line:
if h:a=1;b=9
for g in(1,2):a=1;b=9
But if you have a nesting of control structures (e.g. if
in a for
, or if
in a def
), then you need the newline:
if h:for g in(1,2):a=1;b=9 #ERROR
if h:
for g in(1,2):a=1;b=9 # SAUL GOODMAN
a,b=1,9
does not save any bytes
\$\endgroup\$
– Felipe Nardi Batista
Jul 12 '17 at 14:40
Say you have an dictionary literal, which I'll denote {...}
, and you want to get the value for a key k
, with a default of d
if k
is missing.
You can save two bytes by prepending an entry rather than using get
{k:d,...}[k]
{...}.get(k,d)
Because later entries override earlier ones of the same key, the entry k:d
gets overwritten if it appears in the dict, but remains if key k
isn't present.
Note that this required writing k
twice, which is fine for a variable, but poor when k
is an expression.
Use list(iter(input,eof))
to take multi-line input. eof
can be any string that you want to stop taking input on if you see it. An example would be eof = ''
. The python 2 version is list(iter(raw_input,eof))
, however you may want to use sys.stdin.readlines()
instead if you have already imported sys
.
list(iter(input,eof))
is shorter by one, you don't need that space. Also worth noting that this is only for Python 3 - Python 2 is 4 bytes longer because raw_input
.
\$\endgroup\$
– Mego
Nov 30 '15 at 3:15
Many sequence challenges ask you to find the n'th number in a sequence of increasing positive integers. When you have a expression p(i)
that checks membership, you can do this with the recursive function:
f=lambda n,i=1:n and-~f(n-p(i),i+1)
Note that expression p(i)
must give 0 or 1, not just Falsey or Truthy. The outputs are one-indexed, so say for the sequence of primes, it would give
f(1) = 2
f(2) = 3
...
For 0-indexed outputs, shift the base case
f=lambda n,i=1:n+1and-~f(n-p(i),i+1)
The recursive function f=lambda n,i=1:n and-~f(n-p(i),i+1)
works by decrementing the required count n
each time it gets a hit, and incrementing the output value each time for each value it checks. It might seem weird to redundantly track i
, but it's longer to do:
f=lambda n,i=1:n and f(n-p(i),i+1)or~-i
Also compare the natural list strategy (zero-indexed here)
lambda n:[i for i in range(n*n)if p(i)][n]
(You might need a larger bound than n*n
.)
It's common to want to iterate over adjacent pairs of items in a list or string, i.e.
"golf" -> [('g','o'), ('o','l'), ('l','f')]
There's a few methods, and which is shortest depends on specifics.
Shift and zip
## 47 bytes
l=input()
for x,y in zip(l,l[1:]):do_stuff(x,y)
Create a list of adjacent pairs, by removing the first element and zipping the original with the result. This is most useful in a list comprehension like
sum(abs(x-y)for x,y in zip(l,l[1:]))
You can also use map
with a two-input function, though note that the original list is no longer truncated.
## Python 2
map(cmp,l[:-1],l[1:])
Keep the previous
## 41 bytes, Python 3
x,*l=input()
for y in l:do_stuff(x,y);x=y
Iterate over the elements of the list, remembering the element from a previous loop. This works best with Python 3's ability to unpack to input into the initial and remaining elements.
If there's an initial value of x
that serves as a null operation in do_stuff(x,y)
, you can iterate over the whole list.
## 39 bytes
x=''
for y in input():do_stuff(x,y);x=y
Truncate from the front
## 46 bytes
l=input()
while l[1:]:do_stuff(*l[:2]);l=l[1:]
Keep shortening the list and act on the first two elements. This works best when your operation is better-expressed on a length-two list or string than on two values.
Python 3 can do shorter with unpacking. You can shorten to while l:
if your operation is harmless on singletons.
I've written these all as loops, but they also lend to a recursive functions. You can also adjust to get cyclic pairs by putting the first element at the end of the list, or as the initial previous-value.