10
\$\begingroup\$

I seem to have gotten myself into a bit of a pickle. Literally. I dropped a bunch of pickles on the floor and now they're all scattered about! I need you to help me collect them all. Oh, did I mention I have a bunch of robots at my command? (They're also all scattered all over the place; I'm really bad at organizing things.)

You must take input in the form of:

P.......
..1..2..
.......P
........
P3PP...4
.......P

i.e., multiple lines of either ., P (pickle), or a digit (robot's ID). (You may assume that each line is of equal length, padded with ..) You can input these lines as an array, or slurp from STDIN, or read in a comma-separated single line, or read a file, or do whatever you would like to take the input.

Your output must be in the form of n lines, where n is the highest robot ID. (Robot IDs will always be sequantial starting at 1.) Each line will contain the robot's path, formed from the letters L (left), R (right), U (up), and D (down). For example, here's an example output for that puzzle:

LLU
RDR
LRRR
D

It can also be

LLU RDR LRRR D

Or

["LLU","RDR","LRRR","D"]

Or any format you would like, as long as you can tell what the solution is supposed to be.

Your goal is to find the optimal output, which is the one that has the least steps. The amount of steps is counted as the greatest amount of steps from all of the robots. For example, the above example had 4 steps. Note that there may be multiple solutions, but you only need to output one.

Scoring:

  • Your program will be run with each of the 5 (randomly generated) test cases.
  • You must add the steps from each run, and that will be your score.
  • The lowest total, cumulative score will win.
  • You may not hard-code for these specific inputs. Your code should also work for any other input.
  • Robots can pass through each other.
  • Your program must be deterministic, i.e. same output for every run. You can use a random number generator, as long as it's seeded and consistently produces the same numbers cross-platform.
  • Your code must run within 3 minutes for each of the inputs. (Preferrably much less.)
  • In case of a tie, most upvotes will win.

Here are the test cases. They were randomly generated with a small Ruby script I wrote up.

P.......1.
..........
P.....P...
..P.......
....P2....
...P.P....
.PP..P....
....P....P
PPPP....3.
.P..P.P..P

....P.....
P....1....
.P.....PP.
.PP....PP.
.2.P.P....
..P....P..
.P........
.....P.P..
P.....P...
.3.P.P....

..P..P..P.
..1....P.P
..........
.......2P.
...P....P3
.P...PP..P
.......P.P
..P..P..PP
..P.4P..P.
.......P..

..P...P...
.....P....
PPPP...P..
..P.......
...P......
.......P.1
.P..P....P
P2PP......
.P..P.....
..........

......PP.P
.P1..P.P..
......PP..
P..P....2.
.P.P3.....
....4..P..
.......PP.
..P5......
P.....P...
....PPP..P

Good luck, and don't let the pickles sit there for too long, or they'll spoil!


Oh, and why pickles, you ask?

Why not?

\$\endgroup\$
14
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ There is no reasonable way to show that you actually found the "optimal output" since this is essentially a traveling salesman(men) problem and is NP complete. \$\endgroup\$
    – Wally
    Mar 4, 2014 at 1:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Wally Hmm, it is? Perhaps someone should find the minimum steps for the test case provided, and then all answers can be based upon that. \$\endgroup\$
    – Doorknob
    Mar 4, 2014 at 1:18
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The test case is probably small enough to brute force a minimum - if someone wanted to do that. And/or everyone who answers could tell what they got for the test case and you could require other answers to at least match that minimum. \$\endgroup\$
    – Wally
    Mar 4, 2014 at 1:25
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Can robots pass through each other? If not, what are the timing restrictions on interpreting the paths? \$\endgroup\$ Mar 4, 2014 at 7:38
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Gareth The problem with that is that scores will not be known until the testcases are revealed, and then submissions after that will already see the testcases. \$\endgroup\$
    – Doorknob
    Mar 5, 2014 at 3:19

2 Answers 2

6
\$\begingroup\$

Ruby, 15+26+17+26+17 = 101

Robot Finds Pickles!

Okay, here's a baseline to get people started, using the following super-naive algorithm:

  • Each tick, each robot will act in numeric order, performing the following steps:
    • Identify the closest (Manhattan distance) pickle that no other robots are targeting.
    • Figure out which adjacent squares are available to move to.
    • Choose one of those squares, preferring directions that move it closer to the selected pickle.

Here's what it looks like for Test Case #1:

Animated Example for TC1

Obviously this isn't very good but it's a start!

Code:

Tile = Struct.new(:world, :tile, :x, :y) do
    def passable?
        tile =~ /\.|P/
    end

    def manhattan_to other
        (self.x - other.x).abs + (self.y - other.y).abs
    end

    def directions_to other
        directions = []
        directions << ?U if self.y > other.y
        directions << ?D if self.y < other.y
        directions << ?L if self.x > other.x
        directions << ?R if self.x < other.x
        directions
    end

    def one_step direction
        nx,ny = case direction
            when ?U then [self.x, self.y - 1]
            when ?D then [self.x, self.y + 1]
            when ?L then [self.x - 1, self.y]
            when ?R then [self.x + 1, self.y]
        end

        self.world[nx,ny]
    end

    def move direction
        destination = one_step(direction)
        raise "can't move there" unless destination && destination.passable?

        destination.tile, self.tile = self.tile, ?.
    end
end

class World
    DIRECTIONS = %w(U D L R)

    def initialize s
        @board = s.split.map.with_index { |l,y| l.chars.map.with_index { |c,x| Tile.new(self, c, x, y) }}
        @width = @board[0].length
    end

    def [] x,y
        y >= 0 && x >= 0 && y < @board.size && x < @board[y].size && @board[y][x]
    end

    def robots
        tiles_of_type(/[0-9]/).sort_by { |t| t.tile }
    end

    def pickles
        tiles_of_type ?P
    end

    def tiles_of_type type
        @board.flatten.select { |t| type === t.tile }
    end

    def inspect
        @board.map { |l| l.map { |t| t.tile }*'' }*?\n
    end
end

gets(nil).split("\n\n").each do |input|
    w = World.new(input)
    steps = Hash[w.robots.map { |r| [r.tile, []] }]
    while (pickles_remaining = w.pickles).size > 0
        current_targets = Hash.new(0)

        w.robots.each do |r|
            target_pickle = pickles_remaining.min_by { |p| [current_targets[p], r.manhattan_to(p)] }

            possible_moves = World::DIRECTIONS.select { |d| t = r.one_step(d); t && t.passable? }
            raise "can't move anywhere" if possible_moves.empty?

            direction = (r.directions_to(target_pickle) & possible_moves).first || possible_moves[0]

            current_targets[target_pickle] += 1
            steps[r.tile] << direction
            r.move(direction)
        end
    end

    puts steps.values.map &:join
    p steps.values.map { |v| v.size }.max
end

Takes input on STDIN in exactly the format of the test case code-block in the original question. Here's what it prints for those test cases:

DDLLDLLLLULLUUD
LDLRRDDLDLLLLDR
URDDLLLLLULLUUL
15
ULDLDDLDRRRURRURDDDDDDDLLL
UUULDDRDRRRURRURDLDDDDLDLL
ULUURURRDDRRRRUUUDDDDLDLLL
26
URRRDRUDDDDLLLDLL
RUUUDLRRDDDLLLDLL
LDRDDLDDLLLLLLLUU
RUUURDRDDLLLLLUUU
17
DULLUUUUULDLDLLLLLDDRUUUUR
UDLRRRURDDLLLUUUUURDRUUUUD
26
LDDLDUUDDDUDDDDDR
ULUULDDDDDRDRDDDR
LULLDUUDDDRDRDDDR
UUUURDUURRRRDDDDD
LDLLUDDRRRRRRUDRR
17
\$\endgroup\$
0
1
\$\begingroup\$

Python, 16+15+14+20+12 = 77

I don't really have any prior experience to travelling salesman type problems but I had a bit of time on my hands so I thought I would give it a shot. It basically attempts to allot each bot certain pickles by walking it though a preliminary run where they go for the ones closest to them and farthest from the others. It then brute-forces the most efficient way for each bot to collect its allotted pickles.

I really have no idea how viable this method is, but I suspect it would not work well for larger boards with fewer bots (the fourth board already sometimes takes over two minutes).

Code:

def parse_input(string):
    pickles = []
    size = len(string) - string.count('\n')
    poses = [None] * (size - string.count('.') - string.count('P'))
    for y,line in enumerate(string.strip().split('\n')):
        for x,char in enumerate(line):
            if char == '.':
                continue
            elif char == 'P':
                pickles.append((x,y))
            else:
                poses[int(char)-1] = (x,y)
    return pickles, poses

def move((px,py),(tx,ty)):
    if (px,py) == (tx,ty):
        return (px,py)
    dx = tx-px
    dy = ty-py
    if abs(dx) <= abs(dy):
        if dy < 0:
            return (px,py-1)
        else:
            return (px,py+1)
    else:
        if dx < 0:
            return (px-1,py)
        else:
            return (px+1,py)

def distance(pos, pickle):
    return abs(pos[0]-pickle[0]) + abs(pos[1]-pickle[1])

def calc_closest(pickles,poses,index):
    distances = [[distance(pos,pickle) for pickle in pickles] for pos in poses]
    dist_diffs = []
    for i, pickle_dists in enumerate(distances):
        dist_diffs.append([])
        for j, dist in enumerate(pickle_dists):
            other = [d[j] for d in distances[:i]+distances[i+1:]]
            dist_diffs[-1].append(min(other)-dist)

    sorted = pickles[:]
    sorted.sort(key = lambda ppos: -dist_diffs[index][pickles.index(ppos)])
    return sorted

def find_best(items,level):
    if level == 0:
        best = (None, None)
        for rv, rest in find_best(items[1:],level+1):
            val = distance(items[0],rest[0]) + rv
            if best[0] == None or val < best[0]:
                best = (val, [items[0]] + rest)
        return best

    if len(items) == 1:
        return [(0,items[:])]

    size = len(items)
    bests = []
    for i in range(size):
        best = (None, None)
        for rv, rest in find_best(items[:i]+items[i+1:],level+1):
            val = distance(items[i],rest[0]) + rv
            if best[0] == None or val < best[0]:
                best = (val, [items[i]] + rest)
        if best[0] != None:
            bests.append(best)
    return bests

def find_best_order(pos,pickles):
    if pickles == []:
        return 0,[]
    best = find_best([pos]+pickles,0)
    return best

def walk_path(pos,path):
    history = ''
    while path:
        npos = move(pos, path[0])
        if npos == path[0]:
            path.remove(path[0])

        if npos[0] < pos[0]:
            history += 'L'
        elif npos[0] > pos[0]:
            history += 'R'
        elif npos[1] < pos[1]:
            history += 'U'
        elif npos[1] > pos[1]:
            history += 'D'
        pos = npos
    return history

def find_paths(input_str):
    pickles, poses = parse_input(input_str)                 ## Parse input string and stuff
    orig_pickles = pickles[:]
    orig_poses = poses[:]
    numbots = len(poses)

    to_collect = [[] for i in range(numbots)]               ## Will make a list of the pickles each bot should go after
    waiting = [True] * numbots
    targets = [None] * numbots
    while pickles:
        while True in waiting:                              ## If any bots are waiting for a new target
            index = waiting.index(True)
            closest = calc_closest(pickles,poses,index)     ## Prioritizes next pickle choice based upon how close they are RELATIVE to other bots
            tar = closest[0]

            n = 0
            while tar in targets[:index]+targets[index+1:]:                 ## Don't target the same pickle!
                other_i = (targets[:index]+targets[index+1:]).index(tar)
                dist_s = distance(poses[index],tar)
                dist_o = distance(poses[other_i],tar)
                if dist_s < dist_o:
                    waiting[other_i] = True
                    break

                n += 1
                if len(closest) <= n:
                    waiting[index] = False
                    break
                tar = closest[n]

            targets[index] = tar
            waiting[index] = False      

        for i in range(numbots):                            ## Move everything toward targets  (this means that later target calculations will not be based on the original position)
            npos = move(poses[i], targets[i])
            if npos != poses[i]:
                poses[i] = npos
            if npos in pickles:
                to_collect[i].append(npos)
                pickles.remove(npos)
                for t, target in enumerate(targets):
                    if target == npos:
                        waiting[t] = True               

    paths = []
    sizes = []

    for i,pickle_group in enumerate(to_collect):                    ## Lastly brute force the most efficient way for each bot to collect its allotted pickles
        size,path = find_best_order(orig_poses[i],pickle_group)
        sizes.append(size)
        paths.append(path)
    return max(sizes), [walk_path(orig_poses[i],paths[i]) for i in range(numbots)]

def collect_pickles(boards):
    ## Collect Pickles!
    total = 0
    for i,board in enumerate(boards):
        result = find_paths(board)
        total += result[0]
        print "Board "+str(i)+": ("+ str(result[0]) +")\n"
        for i,h in enumerate(result[1]):
            print '\tBot'+str(i+1)+': '+h
        print

    print "Total Score: " + str(total)

boards = """
P.......1.
..........
P.....P...
..P.......
....P2....
...P.P....
.PP..P....
....P....P
PPPP....3.
.P..P.P..P

....P.....
P....1....
.P.....PP.
.PP....PP.
.2.P.P....
..P....P..
.P........
.....P.P..
P.....P...
.3.P.P....

..P..P..P.
..1....P.P
..........
.......2P.
...P....P3
.P...PP..P
.......P.P
..P..P..PP
..P.4P..P.
.......P..

..P...P...
.....P....
PPPP...P..
..P.......
...P......
.......P.1
.P..P....P
P2PP......
.P..P.....
..........

......PP.P
.P1..P.P..
......PP..
P..P....2.
.P.P3.....
....4..P..
.......PP.
..P5......
P.....P...
....PPP..P
""".split('\n\n')

collect_pickles(boards)

Output:

Board 0: (16)

    Bot1: DLDLLLLDLLULUU
    Bot2: LDLDLLDDLDRURRDR
    Bot3: URDDLLLULULURU

Board 1: (15)

    Bot1: ULRDRDRRDLDDLUL
    Bot2: DDURURULLUUL
    Bot3: ULRRDRRRURULRR

Board 2: (14)

    Bot1: URRRDDDDDRLLUL
    Bot2: UUURDRDDLD
    Bot3: DDDLDDLUUU
    Bot4: RULLLDUUUL

Board 3: (20)

    Bot1: DLULUUUUULDLLLULDDD
    Bot2: LURDDURRDRUUUULUULLL

Board 4: (12)

    Bot1: LDDLDR
    Bot2: ULUULRRR
    Bot3: LUURURDR
    Bot4: RRRDRDDDR
    Bot5: LLDLRRRDRRRU

Total Score: 77
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.