If you're sad, that's wrong. We need to scrub out ALL sadness.
This is a sad face, for reference:
...... .S..S. ........ ...SS... ..SS..SS.. .S......S. ........
S is a consistent pixel,
. is any pixel other than
. should be considered. Theoretical sad face overlap in the corners is possible, but overwriting one sad face has a chance to eliminate the other, e.g. if it was in a
. character and is overwritten with an
An image, in any acceptable format. I would recommend a color matrix.
The same image, but take all those treasonous sad faces and replace their
S characters with randomized data. The data should be either random RGB values, or values taken from the palette of the image. You just need to have a nonzero probability of all outputs; you do not need to make it uniform.
Scan be any pixel, as long as it's the same pixel throughout the formation.
- Remove ALL sad faces. If the removal makes a new sad face, then remove that too.
- You should only modify
Spixels. Unauthorized modification of pixels is insubordination, punishable by disqualification.
- The shortest answer in bytes wins.
These have one sad face each:
This has 2 sad faces, on the left and right:
This has 2 sad faces overlapping:
This has 2 sad faces, in the top-left and bottom-right; the bottom-left and top-right have
S characters in the place of