# Solve the CodeSprint4 Leibniz code golf challenge in Python in 66 characters

Check out this challenge:

https://www.hackerrank.com/codesprint4/challenges/leibniz

(The competition has already ended, so I'm just curious about the Python solution, which the organizers refused to reveal, so this is not cheating in any way.)

I only managed to solve the challenge in 77 characters. (Talking only about Python here.) However, one adr2370 managed to solve the challenge in 66 characters!

Please help me find the 66-character solution! I'm very very curious because I had to work really hard to bring mine down to 77, and I'm amazed as to how someone came up with a 66-character solution.

For reference, my solution:

for j in'x'*input():print'%.15f'%sum((-1)**i/(2.*i+1)for i in range(input()))

• Very close to being a duplicate of Calculate pi to 5 decimals (which has a Python solution, FWIW). – Peter Taylor Feb 18 '13 at 23:09
• Sorry, I'm curious about a solution for this exact puzzle, not a related puzzle. – Ram Rachum Feb 19 '13 at 0:08
• Suggest you read through tips-for-golfing-in-python. You can easily drop a few more chars – gnibbler Feb 19 '13 at 0:30
• You should open it up to other languages and see how short people can program it :) – beary605 Feb 19 '13 at 1:03
• Actually, it seems the top python solution wasn't really python, it was just a hack. So no one got a 66-character solution. – Ari Feb 19 '13 at 18:07

## Python 71 bytes

exec"print'%.15g'%sum((-1.)**i/(i-~i)for i in range(input()));"*input()


Not quite 66 bytes, but with a score of 22.90, it would have ranked second overall.

Edit: regarding Ari's comment about the 66 byte Python solution being a 'hack', I don't think that's exactly what happened. I've noticed several times that the submitted language is displayed incorrectly. For example here: Baconian Cipher. This challenge may only be submitted in Brainf_ck, yet the second ranked solution was submitted in Python 2 (interestingly enough, spot 23 is also Python 2. If I were to speculate, I would say that if the language information is missing from a submission for whatever reason, it seems to default to Python).

I suspect that a similar error may have occurred here, and that the shortest Python solution submitted during the challenge was actually 72 bytes.

Update: After speaking with a moderator, it seems that Ari was right: • Delightful hacks here! – Ram Rachum Feb 21 '13 at 0:28

## Python, 65 characters

exec'printsum((-1.)**x/(x-~x)for x in range(input()));'*input()

• Interesting. The result of input 10, for example, is not correctly rounded, but is still accepted as correct. Nice find. – primo Sep 30 '13 at 18:34

# Python 2 (50 chars, with input loop grows)

a=n=1.;s=0;exec's+=a/n;a=-a;n+=2;'*input();print s


also prints only 12 digits of result, with loop and formatting

exec input()*"a=n=1.;s=0;exec's+=a/n;a=-a;n+=2;'*input();print '%.15f'%s;"


74 chars

# Python 3 (57 chars, with input loop grows to 79 chars)

without loop

a=n=1;s=0;exec('s+=a/n;a=-a;n+=2;'*int(input()));print(s)


with loop

exec(int(input())*"a=n=1;s=0;exec('s+=a/n;a=-a;n+=2;'*int(input()));print(s);")


Python 3 prints 16 digits by default

exec(int(input())*"print(sum((-1)**i/(i-~i)for i in range(int(input()))));")


76 chars

• A few problems: these don't iterate through a list of inputs (but rather only process a single input), and don't output the answer rounded to 15 decimal places (by default, Python only prints 12 digits of a float). Under these conditions, 49 bytes is possible, simply by removing the formatting and iteration from the accepted answer print sum((-1.)**i/(i-~i)for i in range(input())) – primo Oct 1 '13 at 5:41