Skip to main content

Timeline for Next Friday the 13th

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

33 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 1, 2019 at 17:45 answer added Kevin Cruijssen timeline score: 0
Mar 1, 2019 at 16:25 answer added Ven timeline score: 1
Mar 1, 2019 at 10:45 answer added Ven timeline score: 3
Mar 1, 2019 at 9:41 answer added dana timeline score: 2
Nov 10, 2017 at 15:36 answer added Kevin Cruijssen timeline score: 0
Apr 9, 2014 at 14:23 answer added draegtun timeline score: 0
Dec 12, 2013 at 23:39 answer added Adam Speight timeline score: 0
Dec 12, 2013 at 1:40 answer added Roberto timeline score: 2
Dec 11, 2013 at 13:21 answer added guy777 timeline score: 2
Dec 11, 2013 at 8:23 answer added plannapus timeline score: 2
Feb 21, 2011 at 16:31 vote accept Daniel Standage
Feb 17, 2011 at 21:14 answer added Joey timeline score: 3
Feb 17, 2011 at 17:08 answer added mootinator timeline score: 1
Feb 17, 2011 at 7:21 answer added YOU timeline score: 1
Feb 17, 2011 at 5:36 answer added dan04 timeline score: 2
Feb 17, 2011 at 4:40 answer added Steve timeline score: 2
Feb 17, 2011 at 0:05 answer added Jonathan M Davis timeline score: 3
Feb 16, 2011 at 23:48 answer added J B timeline score: 4
Feb 16, 2011 at 22:40 comment added J B @Daniel Standage: my question predates those, so that makes for a weak argument; but the decision is acceptable on its own nonetheless.
Feb 16, 2011 at 21:21 comment added gnibbler Well this one is not really possible with golfscript because it doesn't know today's date*. It also doesn't have a date library so would likely be quite a large answer anyway. (*you can use ruby eval to get it, but then might as well use ruby date lib too)
Feb 16, 2011 at 21:04 answer added Jess timeline score: 2
Feb 16, 2011 at 20:58 answer added gnibbler timeline score: 2
Feb 16, 2011 at 20:53 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/37977795166605313
Feb 16, 2011 at 20:50 comment added Daniel Standage @JB Yeah, since there are several other solutions that do address all of the requirements, I wouldn't accept your response as the solution even if it was the shortest. That doesn't mean your response wasn't informative...but yeah, dealing with an inconsistent date format would be frustrating.
Feb 16, 2011 at 19:10 answer added Joey timeline score: 6
Feb 16, 2011 at 18:21 answer added sepp2k timeline score: 4
Feb 16, 2011 at 18:08 answer added Aman ZeeK Verma timeline score: 2
Feb 16, 2011 at 18:06 comment added Daniel Standage @sepp2k You can decide, you don't need to support both, the user just needs a way to input a date.
Feb 16, 2011 at 16:58 comment added sepp2k Do you mean we can decide whether we want to take the date as an argument or from STDIN or that we need to support both?
Feb 16, 2011 at 16:38 answer added Arnaud Le Blanc timeline score: 2
Feb 16, 2011 at 16:37 answer added J B timeline score: 2
Feb 16, 2011 at 16:05 comment added J B Would a 2013-9-13 output be ok for the first example?
Feb 16, 2011 at 15:21 history asked Daniel Standage CC BY-SA 2.5