Timeline for Finding prime numbers without using "prime characters"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 21, 2017 at 14:28 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Wow, nice going, I missed a space.
|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 23:39 | comment | added | Adalynn | To be exact, it's now byte counted in APL, but it's restriction on source is Unicode. (I realized the challenge allowed non-Unicode byte counts) | |
| Nov 8, 2016 at 23:38 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 23:29 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 23:04 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 117 characters in body
|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 22:22 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Useless new line.
|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 19:59 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Just realized the byte count can be in non-unicode encoding.
|
| Oct 18, 2016 at 23:52 | comment | added | Adalynn | UTF-8. Yeah, but at those low character points, there's going to be more primes. | |
| Oct 17, 2016 at 18:15 | comment | added | NoOneIsHere | Is this in APL encoding or UTF-8? If you convert it to APL encoding (and it's valid) it would be much shorter in bytes. | |
| Oct 17, 2016 at 16:02 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added alternate solution.
|
| Oct 17, 2016 at 15:40 | review | Late answers | |||
| Oct 17, 2016 at 15:46 | |||||
| Oct 17, 2016 at 15:34 | history | edited | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Wow, space, fail.
|
| Oct 17, 2016 at 15:21 | history | answered | Adalynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |