Timeline for StringgnirtSStringgnirtSStringgnirtS
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 15, 2016 at 12:18 | comment | added | Olivier Grégoire | @KevinCruijssen Java 7 is not supported anymore (except with big $$$). We shouldn't have to specify the version of Java. Also, if you write as Java 7, most of the answers can be written in Java 1.1 or 1.2. So shouldn't you write the lowest version with which it works? If the code in this answer was Java 7 compliant, it'd be Java 1.2 compliant, and... would still work in Java 8. | |
| Sep 15, 2016 at 9:46 | comment | added | Shaun Wild | Na, it's fine to assume that his is using the latest version of Java. | |
| Sep 15, 2016 at 9:46 | history | edited | Shaun Wild | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 41 characters in body
|
| Sep 15, 2016 at 8:26 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen |
This can be golfed some more: (s,r)->{for(int i=0;i++<s.length();)r+=i%2<1?s:new StringBuffer(s).reverse();return r;}; (88 bytes). Also, I would specify that this is Java 8.
|
|
| Sep 15, 2016 at 8:13 | history | answered | Shaun Wild | CC BY-SA 3.0 |