Timeline for Exploded substrings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 7, 2016 at 5:03 | comment | added | Leaky Nun | 1 byte saved | |
Apr 28, 2016 at 6:55 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
Apr 28, 2016 at 6:55 | comment | added | Martin Ender |
@CatsAreFluffy No the explanation was correct. When we remove prefixes from prefixes, we get substrings. As for the other suggestions, I don't think I'll make options imply stages. While currently, a lot characters are used only for one stage type, that will probably change in the future. As for .+ and .* I'd have to tokenise the regex, and while I'm planning to do that at some point, I don't think it's gonna happen any time soon (and if I do, I'll probably focus on features that actually add expressiveness).
|
|
Apr 28, 2016 at 6:53 | history | rollback | Martin Ender |
Rollback to Revision 5
|
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 23:45 | history | edited | CalculatorFeline | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 23:42 | comment | added | CalculatorFeline | Also prefixes of prefixes of a string=prefixes of a string. Maybe you meant prefixes of suffixes? (Edited to correct.) | |
Apr 27, 2016 at 23:40 | comment | added | CalculatorFeline |
Can we have ! implies M and 1char versions of .+ and .* ?
|
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 12:59 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1111 characters in body
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 12:48 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 168 characters in body
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 12:39 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 11:17 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 11:05 | history | answered | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |