Timeline for Format the reputation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 21, 2016 at 22:01 | vote | accept | nicael | ||
| Jun 21, 2016 at 22:01 | vote | accept | nicael | ||
| Jun 21, 2016 at 22:01 | |||||
| Jun 21, 2016 at 22:00 | vote | accept | nicael | ||
| Jun 21, 2016 at 22:01 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2016 at 10:13 | answer | added | TFeld | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 13, 2016 at 1:10 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 22:09 | comment | added | nicael | @Peter Thanks, made a correction. As for the golfed (:D) explanation, thanks again, but I'd like to keep it expanded for better illustration. | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 22:07 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 45 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 22:06 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | (I'm assuming that by "you don't need to handle the rep greater than one million" you also don't require handling rep which would round to one million to 3s.f.) | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 22:05 | comment | added | Peter Taylor |
I think the explanation could be shortened by saying "If the rep is in the range 10000 to 994999 (both inclusive), it is rounded to 3 significant figures using the half-up rule, divided by 1000, and displayed with . for a decimal point and with a suffixed k; subject to the caveat that if the third significant figure is 0 and is to the right of the decimal point then the value is displayed only to 2 significant figures." The specific cutoffs could then be moved to a single list of test cases at the end of the post, which is more convenient for copy-pasting into a test framework.
|
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 21:26 | comment | added | nicael | @edc Ok, but how I can know it's the default behavior in any language? I've just listed the rules so as not to make the question ambiguous. Otherwise there would certainly be the comments asking to clarify. | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 21:24 | comment | added | edc65 | Yes, there are many ways, but this is the usual way. For instance in javascript I just had to use the standard method .toFixed() to obtain the correct rounding | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 21:22 | comment | added | nicael | @Edc See this answer by Peter Taylor. | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 21:16 | answer | added | edc65 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 21:04 | comment | added | edc65 | A long explanation, but all in all, it's just the way rounding is usally done | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 20:08 | comment | added | nicael | @Milo Easy - he earned 93k for 2015. He has 163,685 left until 1,000,000, so this way it will take him more than 1,5 years (almost 2, I'd say). With this, you should also take into account that his yearly rep is decreasing with each year, since 2011. 2011: 134.7k, 2012: 131.8k, 2013: 116.8k, 2014: 104.3k, 2015: 94.3k. | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 19:20 | comment | added | Milo Brandt | "Because Jon Skeet doesn't seem to be reaching 1,000,000 soon" [citation needed] | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 16:25 | history | edited | FryAmTheEggman |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 16:25 | answer | added | ETHproductions | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 16:17 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 16:17 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 16:17 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 16:15 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 16:09 | answer | added | ETHproductions | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 15:57 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 15:51 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 15:44 | history | asked | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |