Timeline for Alex-style Addition
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 14, 2015 at 2:25 | comment | added | El'endia Starman | @RetoKoradi: Is my edit satisfactory? | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 2:25 | history | edited | El'endia Starman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Proper-ified answer.
|
| Dec 14, 2015 at 2:12 | comment | added | El'endia Starman | @RetoKoradi: Alright, that's understandable. What do you think of Doorknob's suggestion? | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 2:11 | comment | added | Reto Koradi | If the language doesn't have functions, you can always post full programs. My understanding is that when it says "function", it either has to be a named function, or an anonymous function (which is typically an expression that can be assigned to a function variable). I once posted something similar to this in CJam, and Martin quickly called me out on it, saying that it was a code fragment, and not a function. | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 2:10 | comment | added | Doorknob |
Isn't that technically like saying "my CJam code fragment is a function; you just have to surround it with curly braces"? At the very least, you should probably include the f at the end in the char count (and technically the preceding newline if you're feeling extra-pedantic, but I don't think that's necessary).
|
|
| Dec 14, 2015 at 2:07 | comment | added | El'endia Starman | @RetoKoradi: I can put such a "code fragment" on it's own line, jump to it with 0kF (where k is some number), and jump back with f at the end. That's the closest you'll get to a function in Minkolang. | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 2:00 | comment | added | Reto Koradi | Is this really a function? I quickly scanned through the language documentation, and couldn't find anything describing function definitions. Based on the explanation, it looks more like a code fragment. | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 1:39 | history | edited | El'endia Starman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved answer.
|
| Dec 14, 2015 at 1:22 | history | answered | El'endia Starman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |