Timeline for Simplify binary
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 8:22 | history | edited | rink.attendant.6 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
golfed
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 8:12 | history | edited | rink.attendant.6 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
golfed again
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:46 | comment | added | rink.attendant.6 | @nderscore Thanks, but recursion was 4 bytes shorter :-) | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:46 | history | edited | rink.attendant.6 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
golfed
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:23 | history | edited | rink.attendant.6 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:20 | comment | added | rink.attendant.6 |
@ןnɟuɐɯɹɐןoɯ For some reason the eval'd function does not work with 1. because it doesn't enter the loop I assume
|
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:15 | comment | added | Downgoat | 5 bytes shorter with eval and anonymous functions | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:08 | history | edited | rink.attendant.6 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add demo
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:08 | comment | added | Mama Fun Roll | If you use eval, you might be able to pull off an implicit return. | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:01 | history | answered | rink.attendant.6 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |