Timeline for Fibonacci + Fizz Buzz = Fibo Nacci!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
72 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20 at 18:34 | answer | added | C K | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 11 at 21:15 | answer | added | macOSisthebestOS | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 25, 2022 at 1:53 | answer | added | Matthew Jensen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 25, 2022 at 0:44 | answer | added | lyxal | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 1, 2020 at 14:31 | answer | added | hugovdberg | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 1, 2020 at 13:44 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 13, 2018 at 3:29 | answer | added | Jo King♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 12, 2018 at 20:52 | answer | added | hakr14 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 22, 2016 at 10:56 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | Related | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 18:39 | answer | added | asibahi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 18:14 | comment | added | Greg Martin | Math comment: every third Fibonacci number is even, and every fourth Fibonacci number is a multiple of 3. This might lead to alternate coding strategies, which don't require testing divisibility. | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 16:50 | answer | added | bb94 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 9:45 | comment | added | user54200 | Fibo Nazi (lol) | |
| Jun 18, 2016 at 21:43 | answer | added | Erik the Outgolfer | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 15, 2016 at 18:48 | answer | added | george | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 7:13 | history | edited | user41805 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed user id in stack snippet
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 17:24 | comment | added | Sparr | :( @ approx-66-bit int requirement | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 16:26 | answer | added | Scott | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 14:35 | answer | added | Emigna | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 12:57 | answer | added | Nina Scholz | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 15, 2015 at 19:44 | vote | accept | user41805 | ||
| Nov 14, 2015 at 15:58 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 14, 2015 at 15:45 | answer | added | Stefano Sanfilippo | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 14, 2015 at 9:48 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 14, 2015 at 4:14 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 14, 2015 at 3:36 | answer | added | primo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 13, 2015 at 12:21 | answer | added | Jacob Akkerboom | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 20:57 | answer | added | olegz | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 20:22 | answer | added | Sebastian Sandqvist | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 19:24 | comment | added | SztupY | @ChrisJester-Young it's still an unnecessarry limitation, that might make creative implementators steer clear of this task. And most of the solutions (including the 2nd most upvoted one) are breaking already | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 17:43 | answer | added | user47197 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 17:43 | comment | added | C. K. Young | @SztupY Because the output in this question is completely invariant, you don't even need integers at all. Just treat this question as a kolmogorov-complexity question (I even added the tag) and go from there. | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 17:43 | history | edited | C. K. Young |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 12, 2015 at 17:17 | answer | added | Solomon Ucko | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 18:56 | comment | added | user41805 | @SztupY If I were to make a change now, everyone else's answers would have to change to just the first 80 or 90 numbers. | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 18:05 | answer | added | Michael | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 14:52 | answer | added | mcfedr | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 13:55 | comment | added | SztupY | Would be a much better question if it only required native int support :( | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 | answer | added | HaskellElephant | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 5:30 | comment | added | user41805 | @DanTheMan The program should only output the first 100 Fibo Nacci numbers, no more, no less. | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 21:56 | answer | added | DanTheMan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 21:48 | comment | added | DanTheMan | @ΚριτικσιΛίθος It never says "at least". I think the point of the question is if it would be allowed to print more than 100 Fibo Nacci numbers. | |
| S Nov 10, 2015 at 19:14 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
the scoring snippet was with the wrong question_id
|
| Nov 10, 2015 at 19:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 10, 2015 at 19:14 | |||||
| Nov 10, 2015 at 19:01 | comment | added | user41805 | @mbomb007 Where is the "at least"? | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 17:51 | history | edited | user41805 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added Martin Buttner's stack snippet
|
| Nov 10, 2015 at 16:24 | answer | added | Sock | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 | answer | added | Naouak | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 11:43 | answer | added | MT0 | timeline score: 14 | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 5:18 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 3:00 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 22:59 | answer | added | LegionMammal978 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 22:57 | answer | added | Sam Estep | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 22:56 | comment | added | LegionMammal978 | Maybe it should be called "Fizzo Nacci" | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 22:54 | comment | added | mbomb007 | Do you mean "at least 100"? Or is printing more than 100 not allowed? | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 21:27 | answer | added | MegaTom | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 21:14 | answer | added | olegz | timeline score: 14 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 20:14 | answer | added | steenbergh | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 20:13 | answer | added | PurkkaKoodari | timeline score: 19 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 19:30 | comment | added | user41805 | @Zereges In that matter, I am sorry. :( | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 19:15 | answer | added | Jakotheshadows | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 18:46 | answer | added | Zereges | timeline score: 23 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 18:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/663784307501236224 | ||
| Nov 9, 2015 at 18:16 | answer | added | Hannes Karppila | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 18:15 | comment | added | Zereges | What about languages with highest integer type of only 64 bits? :( Isn't 90 fib. numbers enough? | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 18:07 | answer | added | Sp3000 | timeline score: 50 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 18:06 | answer | added | FryAmTheEggman | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 17:55 | answer | added | Blue | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 17:43 | history | edited | user41805 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Nov 9, 2015 at 17:43 | answer | added | Blue | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 9, 2015 at 17:42 | history | edited | user41805 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1242 characters in body
|
| Nov 9, 2015 at 17:11 | history | asked | user41805 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |