Timeline for Generate the Stöhr sequence
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
36 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 25, 2020 at 20:58 | answer | added | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jan 6, 2018 at 22:12 | comment | added | Théophile | @user75200 The sequence is not arithmetical, as you can see from the differences in the first three elements, but the subsequence starting at the third element is indeed arithmetical. It is used in connection to the Postage Stamp problem. | |
Jan 6, 2018 at 19:39 | comment | added | user75200 | This sequence is arithmetical without any use(?). | |
Jan 30, 2015 at 2:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/560989197641981953 | ||
Jan 29, 2015 at 18:15 | answer | added | Bryan Devaney | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 28, 2015 at 16:38 | vote | accept | Théophile | ||
Jan 27, 2015 at 16:56 | answer | added | Bob Jarvis - Слава Україні | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 27, 2015 at 10:09 | answer | added | Moris Zucca | timeline score: 15 | |
Jan 27, 2015 at 9:12 | answer | added | Sp3000 | timeline score: 4 | |
Jan 27, 2015 at 5:52 | answer | added | Sp3000 | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 27, 2015 at 4:59 | answer | added | user8777 | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 27, 2015 at 4:41 | comment | added | user8777 | Such is the problem with mathematical sequences. If you know the pattern, it will usually be shorter. | |
Jan 27, 2015 at 4:37 | answer | added | Ypnypn | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 21:36 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 20:46 | answer | added | Timtech | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 20:42 | answer | added | Timtech | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 20:21 | answer | added | bmarks | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 20:11 | answer | added | bmarks | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 17:33 | answer | added | Brad Gilbert b2gills | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 14:15 | answer | added | randomra | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 13:37 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 3 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 13:19 | answer | added | Théophile | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 13:09 | comment | added | Théophile | I like the answers so far. Now, it's perhaps too late to go back and change the requirements, but I suppose I should have mentioned that I'm particularly interested in solutions that use the definition of the sequence itself (i.e., the code doesn't know in advance that eventually the numbers go up by 3). So: moral bonus points if you can do that. | |
S Jan 26, 2015 at 12:13 | history | suggested | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited.
|
Jan 26, 2015 at 11:29 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 26, 2015 at 12:13 | |||||
Jan 26, 2015 at 11:09 | answer | added | swish | timeline score: 9 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 10:57 | answer | added | jgosar | timeline score: 6 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 10:42 | answer | added | edc65 | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 10:35 | answer | added | randomra | timeline score: 3 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 7:28 | history | edited | Martin Ender |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 26, 2015 at 7:26 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 6 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 5:42 | answer | added | Logic Knight | timeline score: 7 | |
Jan 26, 2015 at 5:23 | history | edited | Théophile |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 26, 2015 at 5:14 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 26, 2015 at 13:08 | |||||
Jan 26, 2015 at 5:11 | history | asked | Théophile | CC BY-SA 3.0 |