Timeline for Counting Grains of Rice
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2021 at 15:15 | history | edited | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spellfix
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 23:27 | comment | added | Calvin's Hobbies | I'm fine with the average area thing. Grain area is (roughly) constant across images. | |
| Nov 3, 2014 at 19:59 | comment | added | Adam Davis |
Note that this, and all the other solutions using area, fail to follow this rule: Small and large grains are counted alike as one grain each. The results, however, speak well of this method.
|
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 19:57 | comment | added | Adam Davis |
@njzk2 No. Given the rule The images have different dimensions but the scale of the rice in all of them is consistent because the camera and background were stationary. This is merely a value that represents that rule. The result, however, changes according to the input. If you change the rule, then this value will change, but the result will be the same - based on the input.
|
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 16:58 | comment | added | njzk2 |
doesn't that count as hardcoding the result?
|
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 16:56 | comment | added | Ell | @njzk2 No, only their average area :) | |
| Nov 3, 2014 at 16:52 | comment | added | njzk2 | so you need the actual number of grains before measuring them? | |
| Nov 3, 2014 at 16:49 | comment | added | Ell | @njzk2 It's precalculated from the foreground area and actual grain count of the test images. | |
| Nov 3, 2014 at 16:26 | comment | added | njzk2 |
where does avg_grain_area = 3038.38; come from?
|
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 12:38 | history | edited | Ell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 9:57 | history | edited | Ell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 686 characters in body
|
| Nov 2, 2014 at 20:51 | comment | added | Chris Cirefice | This is a really clever solution, nice work! | |
| Nov 2, 2014 at 18:19 | history | answered | Ell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |