Timeline for Prisoner's Dilemma v.2 - Battle Royale
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2014 at 3:27 | comment | added | Joe Z. | I think I'll still accept it this time around, since your code's strategy doesn't appear to be anything malicious and there are too few entrants for it to matter anyway. | |
| May 9, 2014 at 3:22 | comment | added | Geobits |
According to this site, yes. I don't have a handy local base64 hash tool, and was using a simple sha256sum.
|
|
| May 9, 2014 at 3:11 | comment | added | Joe Z. | Is it the same checksum I'm getting, first of all? | |
| May 9, 2014 at 2:45 | comment | added | Geobits | @JoeZ. That's weird, I'm getting a different sum for my local file now also, despite the fact that the file shows a 'modified date' of May 1. WTF. Where do we go from here? My source was the first put up, so it's not like I changed it after seeing another entry, but I understand if you feel you have to disqualify me. | |
| May 9, 2014 at 1:45 | comment | added | Joe Z. |
For some reason, I get XtvwsEmk+vpmox1+t9QMjQP+rbbqOgw+DxdhseS7Fl4= when I download your file and run it through verify.py.
|
|
| May 9, 2014 at 0:57 | history | edited | Geobits | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added code. crossed fingers.
|
| May 9, 2014 at 0:32 | comment | added | Joe Z. | Just a friendly reminder: the coding phase is over; you've got a day to post your source code. (Procedure is at the bottom of the question.) | |
| May 2, 2014 at 21:47 | comment | added | Joe Z. | Actually, it turns out that two of the plants got bugged. I'll have to fix them :S | |
| May 2, 2014 at 21:16 | comment | added | Geobits | @JoeZ. With the knowledge of what the others would do, sure ;) Against unknown entries, I can't see a very reliable strategy. Outliers will be outliers, I guess. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 21:14 | comment | added | Joe Z. | Now, that being said, I've actually had a few AIs get positive scores while running my tests. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 20:28 | comment | added | Joe Z. |
BTW, base64 version of your hash (since my verification program uses base64 notation): thGJOZrpSUszPfinHjYDn2Tx0pMrg401TGiFk9jwlHc=
|
|
| May 2, 2014 at 1:30 | comment | added | Joe Z. | Yeah, I don't expect anyone to actually reach that bounty. It would really be quite a game-theory-defying accomplishment, probably worth real money in research possibilities (A solution that works better than two people always cooperating! Imagine that!) instead of just a measly 100 reputation on Stack Exchange. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 0:58 | comment | added | Geobits | Yep. If I think of something else, I will. I have a hard time believing anyone's going to claim that bounty, though. Going positive in this game would be... unusual. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 0:53 | comment | added | Joe Z. |
Remember you guys can continue making improvements to your solutions up until the 05-09 00:00 deadline.
|
|
| May 2, 2014 at 0:49 | history | answered | Geobits | CC BY-SA 3.0 |