Timeline for Is this position a pure mirror mate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2023 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/1609384082982555649 | ||
| Dec 27, 2022 at 5:44 | history | edited | double-beep | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add double-check clarification
|
| Dec 23, 2022 at 20:46 | comment | added | jezza_99 | @double-beep maybe update the question accordingly | |
| Dec 23, 2022 at 13:25 | answer | added | l4m2 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 21:10 | history | edited | Okx | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
made language consistent
|
| Dec 22, 2022 at 19:57 | comment | added | double-beep | @l4m2 the original definition says double check is allowed if the mate could be parried without it. For simplicity, in the positions given, there will be no double checks. | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 18:39 | comment | added | l4m2 | and case where king is double attacked. Likely one would just check the 3x3 range get attacked exactly once | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 18:37 | comment | added | l4m2 | Maybe add cases where tile is guarded but not attacked? | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 18:29 | comment | added | Arnauld |
@l4m2 In this context, S guarded by X means that the square S is not currently attacked by the white piece X but it would be if the black king moves there. (Like the white bishop on d7 in the 2nd test case.)
|
|
| Dec 22, 2022 at 18:24 | answer | added | jezza_99 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 18:23 | comment | added | l4m2 |
Can't search guard chess on google, all is some variant with a piece named guard
|
|
| Dec 22, 2022 at 17:22 | history | asked | double-beep | CC BY-SA 4.0 |