Timeline for Longest Zero Sum Sub-array
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 19, 2021 at 13:56 | history | edited | hyperneutrino♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 183 characters in body
|
Jul 19, 2021 at 9:49 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan |
A Link that does the job in 7 bytes: ẆSÐḟṪȯ$
|
|
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:50 | comment | added | hyperneutrino♦ |
@tsh if 0 and [0] being the two formats is valid, then I can make the footer format it to avoid jelly's formatting things. it only costs 2 bytes and returning 0 for an empty list feels wrong to me anyway though
|
|
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:49 | comment | added | tsh | Could this be fixed by using function submission with format the output using different way outside the function? If this is a whole program, user cannot guess which output it is currently. And therefore it seems to be invalid to me. | |
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:45 | history | edited | hyperneutrino♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:40 | comment | added | hyperneutrino♦ | @tsh one of them is the number 0 and one of them is a singleton list 0 (Jelly displays both the same way) - is that acceptable? if not, I will add an edge case | |
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:33 | comment | added | tsh |
Your output for [1,2,3] and [0,1,2,3] are both 0 . Although it is arguable if represent an empty array with 0 is acceptable. I don't think that using 0 for both empty array and an array of single 0 should be allowed.
|
|
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:28 | history | edited | hyperneutrino♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 202 characters in body
|
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:27 | comment | added | zoomlogo | Well that was quick | |
Jul 19, 2021 at 6:26 | history | answered | hyperneutrino♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |