Timeline for Auto cycler quine
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
31 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2018 at 19:56 | vote | accept | IQuick 143 | ||
| S May 6, 2018 at 11:59 | history | bounty ended | N. Virgo | ||
| S May 6, 2018 at 11:59 | history | notice removed | N. Virgo | ||
| May 5, 2018 at 10:36 | answer | added | IQuick 143 | timeline score: 21 | |
| May 4, 2018 at 5:50 | comment | added | IQuick 143 | Slowly getting there, currently writing a C# program to generate the final source code in Befunge-98 | |
| May 2, 2018 at 19:56 | comment | added | IQuick 143 | @mbomb007 Finding a language that this is possible in is a part of the challenge | |
| May 2, 2018 at 18:41 | comment | added | mbomb007 |
Well, it's easy to think of languages this is impossible in... Any BF-like program doesn't work, because you can shift to arrive at an unbalanced bracket. Same for JS if you have = or parentheses or brackets. More widely stated: a program cannot contain any character that cannot also be the first character. That rules out so many...
|
|
| May 1, 2018 at 7:00 | comment | added | IQuick 143 | Currently working on a non-cheating Funge-98 Quine. Progress: ~25% | |
| S Apr 29, 2018 at 10:10 | history | bounty started | N. Virgo | ||
| S Apr 29, 2018 at 10:10 | history | notice added | N. Virgo | Canonical answer required | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 12:49 | comment | added | IQuick 143 | @jimmy23013 I checked if a challenge like this one exists and saw the one you linked but this is a different challenge. The point of this one is that your program must survive byte shifting while remaining functional while the mentioned one requires only rotating 2 or more whole parts. | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 11:12 | comment | added | l4m2 | sorry no for it div the repeat part length | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 11:11 | comment | added | l4m2 | @jimmy23013 5083 is such a problem but code-bowling version | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 7:48 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | Would this count as a 'rotating quine'? ;p | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 7:38 | comment | added | jimmy23013 | Retracted my close vote. The other question is in essence bowling if someone finds a solution. | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 7:34 | comment | added | jimmy23013 | Possible duplicate of Create a rotating quine | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 1:20 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/989313238025359365 | ||
| Apr 25, 2018 at 23:11 | comment | added | Magic Octopus Urn |
<marquee>my code</marquee>
|
|
| Apr 25, 2018 at 22:48 | comment | added | Jo King♦ | I'd recommend mentioning the standard valid quine rules | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 22:01 | comment | added | sergiol |
In tcl, I couldonly do one step: puts [string index [set c [read [open $argv0]]] end][string range $c 0 end-1] tio.run/##NcoxCsAgDEbhq/…
|
|
| Apr 25, 2018 at 20:16 | history | edited | Giuseppe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor grammar and formatting changes
|
| Apr 25, 2018 at 20:00 | comment | added | dylnan | @IQuick143 I think >2 characters is a good requirement for the reason you stated | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 19:37 | comment | added | IQuick 143 | @l4m2 It states more than 2 char because your code would actually print it's reverse which is kinda not the point, also if my expectation is correct some language allows for pushing two characters in stack and then emptying the stack by just 2 characters which Would fulfil a reverse quine challenge but not this one (technically). tl;dr I didn't mean to allow exactly 2 char but if you have a reason why I'm willing to listen. | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 19:31 | comment | added | l4m2 |
Is [exactly 2 char] allowed? (seems not to avoid stack-based language AB)
|
|
| Apr 25, 2018 at 19:20 | comment | added | Dom Hastings | @IQuick143 Yeah no problem, I wasn't implying that at all! Life has been busy lately and I'd forgotten it was even in the sandbox until I saw your post! | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 19:18 | comment | added | Dom Hastings | @mbomb007 I have indeed! I'd kinda forgotten about the items in the sandbox, but there you go! :) | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 19:17 | comment | added | IQuick 143 | @DomHastings Oh well, sorry. I guess we both had the same idea. I have by no means stole your idea though, that would be a false claim. | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 19:13 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @DomHastings You've had months to post that. | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 19:07 | comment | added | Dom Hastings | Well that's upsetting: codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/a/14104/9365 | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 18:31 | history | edited | IQuick 143 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed a grammar mistake
|
| Apr 25, 2018 at 18:27 | history | asked | IQuick 143 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |