Timeline for Should we be friends?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
34 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Apr 14, 2017 at 22:51 | answer | added | seshoumara | timeline score: 0 | |
Apr 9, 2017 at 7:47 | vote | accept | Thunda | ||
Apr 3, 2017 at 20:14 | comment | added | AAM111 |
@WBT ==> null
|
|
Mar 30, 2017 at 21:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/847565581108879360 | ||
Mar 30, 2017 at 7:45 | comment | added | Please stop being evil | @Thunda ah, I figured know X X being truthy was merely special behaviour. Makes more sense. | |
Mar 30, 2017 at 6:22 | history | edited | Thunda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 100 characters in body
|
Mar 30, 2017 at 6:21 | comment | added | Thunda |
@thedarkwanderer FRIEND X Y SUGGEST X X should return falsy because X is friends with X, it's inferred from KNOW X X is truthy. I'll add in a clarification.
|
|
Mar 30, 2017 at 3:24 | answer | added | Keerthana Prabhakaran | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 30, 2017 at 2:35 | comment | added | Thunda | @quintopia Yes. | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 18:24 | comment | added | quintopia | @Thunda in Python, using the built-in REPL requires two extra characters in the command. Should languages like this add those extra bytes to the total length of the program? | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 17:27 | comment | added | WBT |
SUGGEST UK EU .
|
|
Mar 29, 2017 at 15:52 | answer | added | orlp | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 12:31 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 12 | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 10:57 | comment | added | Thunda | @quintopia It can use the language's interpreter. Useful in languages like Haskell or in this case Prolog, but an extra problem for C-type languages. | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 10:49 | history | edited | Thunda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
Mar 29, 2017 at 10:48 | comment | added | Thunda | @ovs I'll... go with yes | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 9:43 | answer | added | Titus | timeline score: 15 | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 9:14 | answer | added | ovs | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 8:52 | comment | added | ovs | Can we have output after the FRIEND command? | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 8:48 | comment | added | quintopia | When you say "your program must be a REPL" does that mean it could use the REPL of the language's interpreter, as is done in the Prolog answer? or does the program have to implement the reading, evaluating, and printing itself? the wording does not make it perfectly clear. | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 8:33 | answer | added | orlp | timeline score: 44 | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 7:51 | comment | added | orlp | This challenge screams Prolog. | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 7:27 | answer | added | Greg Martin | timeline score: 5 | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 7:13 | comment | added | Greg Martin | Thanks! While my personal preference is to separate the input statements from the output statements, I feel I'm in the PPCG minority and more people prefer the arrow versions that you've made. | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 7:09 | comment | added | Thunda | @GregMartin Would you rather I put them such that all of the input statements are in 1 block and all of the output statements are in another for easy comparison? Or the arrows are fine? | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 7:08 | history | edited | Thunda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 283 characters in body
|
Mar 29, 2017 at 6:41 | comment | added | Greg Martin | Having the test cases in text form would be way more helpful. | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 5:41 | history | edited | Thunda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Mar 29, 2017 at 5:41 | comment | added | Thunda | @GregMartin Nope. That's the fun part of the challenge :) | |
Mar 29, 2017 at 5:21 | comment | added | Greg Martin |
So for example, can we start by inputting a list of all people in the network, like {A, B, C, D} ?
|
|
Mar 29, 2017 at 4:14 | history | edited | Thunda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed for consistency
|
Mar 29, 2017 at 4:10 | history | edited | Wheat Wizard♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 29, 2017 at 4:08 | history | asked | Thunda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |